Global Differences on Data Use Will Likely Make Trade Less Open, Lamy Says
Global trade in the digital era will probably not be as open as before due to differences between governments on how data should be used and exchanged, the head of a major global nonprofit for collective action said Saturday.
Speaking via video link at the 2020 Global Digital Trade Conference in the central Chinese city of Wuhan, Pascal Lamy, the president of the Paris Peace Forum, said the world is shifting away from exchanging goods and services and toward exchanging data, a trend that has been accelerated by the Covid-19 pandemic.
“I have my doubts whether, (in) this new phase of globalization, data-driven international exchange will remain open as the previous wave of globalization was open,” said Lamy, who previously served as the director-general of the World Trade Organization.
He said governments hold different attitudes toward a string of data-related issues including user safety, infrastructure, telecommunications, the internet and cybersecurity. The divergences, which reflect countries’ political, philosophical, cultural and cognitive differences, are unlikely to be resolved in the same way as previous disagreements on the trade in goods and services.
“The world of digitized international exchange will not be as open as the previous world of international exchange, because digitization is a case in point of ‘precautionism,’ given the wide range of safety and security concerns,” he said.
Some parts of the world have made efforts to keep trade open, Lamy said, citing the recently adopted Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, a free trade agreement covering 15 Asia-Pacific member states. He added that many countries have pledged trade openness in the digital sphere.
But such convergences are rare in international dialogues, he said.
According to Lamy, the world has three major data governance systems: a U.S.-led system based on the idea that data can be merchandized; a China-led system where data is broadly under state control; and a European Union-led system that views data as personal property.
That kind of fragmentation hampers economies of scale, Lamy said, adding that governments should aim for a form of coexistence, perhaps by developing an overarching system that combines generally accepted rules or by setting up interfaces between different global systems.
Alternatively, countries could state mutual recognition of each other’s systems, he said, although such a move is less realistic and could threaten a loss of trust between nations.
“We have to … acknowledge (the) coming face of globalization, which will be data-driven,” Lamy said. “Finding the right balance between competition and cooperation (is) the fundamental challenge of globalization.
“I hope that collectively we will be wise enough to address it so that this world of data does not fracture,” he said.
Contact reporter Tang Ziyi (email@example.com) and editor Matthew Walsh (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Support quality journalism in China. Subscribe to Caixin Global starting at $0.99.
Download our app to receive breaking news alerts and read the news on the go.
Jan 26 07:02 PM
Jan 26 06:03 PM
Jan 26 05:57 PM
Jan 26 02:42 PM
Jan 26 02:22 PM
Jan 25 07:17 PM
Jan 25 07:03 PM
Jan 25 03:52 PM
Jan 25 12:31 PM
Jan 23 06:06 AM
Jan 22 05:28 PM
Jan 22 04:43 PM
Jan 21 07:27 PM
- 1Gallery: Rescuers Rush to Reach 22 Miners Trapped Underground
- 2Exclusive: Sovereign Wealth Fund Executive to Become Chairman of Major Insurance Firm
- 3South China City’s Digital Currency Test Aims to Keep Migrants From Heading Home for the Holidays
- 4Corrupt Bad Bank Chief Was ‘Enemy Within,’ Watchdogs Say
- 5Gallery: U.S. Artist’s Childhood Dreams Animate Shanghai
- 1Power To The People: Pintec Serves A Booming Consumer Class
- 2Largest hotel group in Europe accepts UnionPay
- 3UnionPay mobile QuickPass debuts in Hong Kong
- 4UnionPay International launches premium catering privilege U Dining Collection
- 5UnionPay International’s U Plan has covered over 1600 stores overseas