U.S. Audit Watchdog Moves Closer to Enforcing Law That Could See Chinese Firms Delisted
The U.S. auditing regulator has proposed new rules that would help it implement a recent law that could trigger the delisting of Chinese companies whose audits cannot be inspected by the watchdog.
The proposed rules, released by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) on Thursday for public comment, provide a framework that would make it easier for the regulator to determine whether it has been unable to completely inspect or investigate a foreign audit firm.
The proposed rules would allow the PCAOB to better carry out its responsibilities under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (HFCA Act), which was signed into law by former U.S. President Donald Trump in December. The law prohibits a company’s securities from trading on U.S. exchanges or over-the-counter markets if the PCAOB is not able to inspect its audits for three years in a row.
Although the law applies to all foreign companies, it is clearly targeted at China. The dispute over China’s reluctance to allow the U.S. audit regulator to inspect Chinese firms’ audits has lasted for years. It escalated amid rising China-U.S. tensions during the Trump administration and the Luckin Coffee Inc. accounting scandal that left American investors with huge losses.
“Cooperation between the PCAOB and our international counterparts is vital to facilitating meaningful audit oversight and to strengthening investor protection,” PCAOB Chairman William D. Duhnke III said in the Thursday announcement. “This rule will enable the PCAOB to fulfill its responsibilities under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, a law passed with extraordinary bipartisan support.”
“The rule addresses situations where overseas authorities have denied the PCAOB the access it needs to conduct its mandated oversight activities,” he said.
According to the proposed rules, the PCAOB would use three factors to determine if it’s been unable to carry out inspections: the regulator’s ability to select engagements, audit areas, and potential violations to be reviewed or investigated; the regulator’s access to, and the ability to retain and use, any document or information in the possession, custody, or control of the companies or associated individuals; and the regulator’s ability to conduct inspections and investigations in a manner consistent with relevant regulations.
The PCAOB said it will accept public comments on the proposal through July 12.
Companies won’t be required to comply with the HFCA Act for fiscal years ending on or prior to Dec. 31, 2020. That means companies will start to be at risk of ejection from the U.S. securities market under the law in 2024.
In addition, the HFCA Act also requires foreign issuers to provide proof that they are not owned or controlled by a foreign government, disclose names of any board members who are officials of China’s ruling Communist Party, and indicate if any articles of incorporation of the issuer contain elements of the party’s charters.
China’s top securities regulator, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, said in December that such requirements “are obviously discriminatory and are not based on professional considerations of securities supervision,” and it “firmly opposes this practice of politicizing securities supervision.”
Starting from May 5, foreign companies listed in the U.S. are required to disclose this kind of information in their filings as required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). On April 30, New York-listed China Petroleum and Chemical Corp., one of China’s top oil refiners, opposed the requirements in a letter to the SEC and said that would add additional unnecessary compliance costs.
Karthik Ramanna, a professor at the Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford, said the Biden administration is unlikely to soften its stance on Chinese companies’ audit inspections. “That’s not going to change in the Biden administration. Trump has already let the genie out of the bottle, and there is little political will in the Biden administration to walk back from that position,” he said.
“It is not clear that it is going to be a tremendous economic loss to either side,” he said, commenting on the impact of potential delisting. “As for the Chinese companies, accessing U.S. listed markets has never really been about capital. It has been more about reputation and signaling.”
“That is less the case today though, with the growing nationalism in China. And there is no shortage of ways in which Chinese companies can raise capital from Americans outside of the listed market,” he said.
Timmy Shen contributed to this report.
Contact reporter Tang Ziyi (firstname.lastname@example.org) and editor Joshua Dummer (email@example.com)
Download our app to receive breaking news alerts and read the news on the go.
Get our weekly free Must-Read newsletter.
- MOST POPULAR