Australian Universities Risk Catastrophic Hit Due to Reliance on China
(AFR) — Australia’s leading universities face a “catastrophic” hit to student revenues if China imposes strict currency controls, with income potentially falling by AU$1 billion ($667 million).
A report from the Centre for Independent Studies says the financial risk of overreliance on China is “very large” and universities can’t mitigate it by diversifying with students from other countries — since this risked creating a financial bubble.
Salvatore Babones, who is an associate professor at the University of Sydney, said his university alone would take an AU$100 million hit to revenue if Chinese enrolments fell by 25%.
The figures were not hypothetical — when Malaysia imposed capital controls during the Asian Financial Crisis, outbound student numbers fell by 25%.
The University of Sydney currently leads the pack, earning more than half a billion Australian dollars from Chinese student fees, which is nearly a quarter of its revenue.
“Australian universities are taking a multibillion-dollar gamble with taxpayers’ money. They’re pursuing a high-risk, high-reward international growth strategy and it may ultimately prove incompatible with their public service mission,” Babones said.
“As long as their bets on the international market pay off their gamble will look like a success. If their bets go sour, taxpayers may be called to pick up the tab.”
He said seven universities had “extraordinary exposure” to the Chinese market: Melbourne, ANU, Sydney, New South Wales, University of Technology of Sydney, Adelaide and Queensland.
Australia is the third biggest market for international students after the U.S. and the U.K., but has almost three times as many on a per-capita basis.
The U.K. has 304 international students for every 100,000 residents and the U.S. has 653. By comparison Australia has 1,559 international students per 100,000 residents.
Professor Babones said in the last year the growth of Chinese students had begun to slow as the universities recruited students from India “very aggressively.”
“Such strategies are doomed to fail, the countries of south and southeast Asia are too small or too poor to contribute the sort of numbers of fee-paying students we would need.”
He said vice chancellors were rushing to India to build up business, with India visa grants rising 42% in 2017-2018.
“This crowd behavior shows signs of a bubble in the making. Each university thinks India offers a reservoir of appropriate students to meet its own needs, without accounting for the fact its competitors are pursuing the same strategy.”
He said the overreliance on Chinese students was two decades in the making and could not be easily unwound.
As a first step universities should be transparent on enrolments and should publish plans to reduce reliance on international students. And they should avoid focus on any single country.
He said universities should also be made to apply the admission standards to international students that apply to ordinary enrolments.
The University of Sydney had a minimum score of 6.5 on the International English Language Testing System (IELTS), but international students using a private college pathway to the university could get admission with a score of 5.
The ANU offered a similar pathway with an IELTS score of 4.0, which meant “not able to use complex language.”
Federal Education Minister Dan Tehan said higher education generated AU$35 billion for the economy and accounted for 240,000 jobs last year.
“We offer a quality higher education in Australia and international students are voting with their feet by coming here. We should be proud of that fact.
“While it makes good sense for all businesses to diversify their customer base, universities are ultimately responsible for their own decisions. Universities are required to be financially viable, and likely to remain financially viable, under the Higher Education Support Act 2003.
He said the education department monitors the financial performance of universities on an annual basis.
“In 2017, the total net operating surplus reported across the seven universities cited in the CIS report was AU$930.4 million. Combined, these universities have a net asset base of AU$22.0 billion, with cash and investments of AU$8.8 billion.”
This story was originally published by The Australian Financial Review. To read the original, click here.
Contact editor Yang Ge (email@example.com)
Apr 08 16:58
Apr 08 13:04
Apr 08 09:33
Apr 08 04:23
Apr 07 15:36
Apr 07 12:22
Apr 07 10:21
Apr 03 18:41
Apr 03 16:11
Apr 03 13:37
Apr 03 10:13
Apr 02 18:19
Apr 02 15:27
Apr 02 14:02
Apr 02 13:46
- 1In Luckin Debacle, Who’s to Blame for Missing Massive Fraud?
- 2In Depth: Why There Will Be No Quick Cure for Trade After the Pandemic
- 3Germany to Buy Avigan From Japan to Fight Coronavirus
- 4China Bans Export of Uncertified Medical Supplies
- 5Fighting COVID-19: Experiences and lessons from the frontlines in Asia
- 1Power To The People: Pintec Serves A Booming Consumer Class
- 2Largest hotel group in Europe accepts UnionPay
- 3UnionPay mobile QuickPass debuts in Hong Kong
- 4UnionPay International launches premium catering privilege U Dining Collection
- 5UnionPay International’s U Plan has covered over 1600 stores overseas