Chen Changhua: Addressing Growth Risks Amid Deflation (AI Translation)
Listen to the full version


文|陈昌华
By Chen Changhua
对于中国一季度经济数据,市场较关注GDP增长,却较少考虑通缩问题。2024年一季度,实际GDP同比上升5.3%,高于全年5%的目标,但名义GDP只增长4.2%,即GDP平减指数同比下降1.1%。
Regarding China's first-quarter economic data, the market is more focused on GDP growth and gives less attention to deflation issues. In the first quarter of 2024, the actual GDP increased by 5.3% year-on-year, surpassing the annual target of 5%. However, nominal GDP only grew by 4.2%, indicating that the GDP deflator fell by 1.1% year-on-year.
GDP平减指数是一个较CPI和PPI衡量价格水平变化更广泛的指标,反映各个经济部门的综合状况。中国一季度的-1.1%GDP平减指数,是2009年以来最低,当年二季度和三季度GDP平减指数为-1.5%。在2015年产能过剩和供给侧改革时,GDP平减指数也只有两个季度的负增长。这次情况不同:2022年四季度之后的六个季度中,除了2023年一季度GDP平减指数为正,其他五个季度的平减指数为负。这代表通缩压力开始植根在经济中,而不是一次短暂的外部冲击。现在有点像1998年至1999年,当时从1997年四季度到1999年四季度的九个季度中,中国的GDP平减指数均为负。
The GDP deflator is a broader measure of changes in price levels compared to the CPI and the PPI, reflecting the overall situation across various economic sectors. China's GDP deflator for the first quarter stood at -1.1%, the lowest since 2009 when the GDP deflator for the second and third quarters was -1.5%. During the period of excess capacity and supply-side reforms in 2015, the GDP deflator also experienced negative growth for just two quarters. This time, however, the situation is different: in the six quarters following the fourth quarter of 2022, except for Q1 2023 when the GDP deflator was positive, the deflator was negative in the other five quarters. This indicates that deflationary pressure is becoming entrenched in the economy, rather than being a temporary external shock. The current scenario resembles the period from 1998 to 1999, when China's GDP deflator was negative for nine consecutive quarters from Q4 1997 to Q4 1999.
值得留意的是,以往中国出现通缩基本由农产品和工业产品价格波动造成,服务业则保持通胀;但2024年一季度服务业平减指数跌到-0.1%,这是1993年相关数据公布以来的首次负增长。在服务业九个细分子行业中,五个行业平减指数为负、一个行业是零、仅三个子行业有不到2%的通胀。服务业多个子行业出现通缩,是通缩压力全面扩散的明证。
Notably, in the past, deflation in China was mainly caused by fluctuations in agricultural and industrial product prices, while the service sector maintained inflation. However, in the first quarter of 2024, the deflator for the service sector dropped to -0.1%, marking the first negative growth since related data was released in 1993. Among the nine sub-sectors within the service industry, five had negative deflators, one was at zero, and only three sub-sectors experienced less than 2% inflation. The emergence of deflation in multiple sub-sectors of the service industry is a clear indication of the widespread deflationary pressure.

- DIGEST HUB
- China's Q1 2024 real GDP grew by 5.3%, surpassing the annual target of 5%, but nominal GDP only increased by 4.2%, indicating a deflationary trend with the GDP deflator dropping by 1.1%.
- The deflationary pressure is widespread, affecting both industrial and service sectors, with the service sector experiencing its first negative deflator since data collection began in 1993.
- The current economic situation is characterized by insufficient demand despite strong supply growth, leading to potential risks for corporate profits, personal income, and government revenue amidst ongoing deflation.
China's first-quarter economic data shows a significant focus on GDP growth, with less attention given to the persisting issue of deflation [para. 1]. For Q1 2024, China's actual GDP saw a year-on-year increase of 5.3%, surpassing the annual target of 5%. However, nominal GDP only grew by 4.2%, leading to a GDP deflator decrease of 1.1% year-on-year, which signals deflationary pressures in the economy [para. 1].
The GDP deflator, a broader measure of price changes compared to the CPI and PPI, reflects the overall economic situation across various sectors. The first quarter GDP deflator at -1.1% is the lowest since 2009, indicating entrenched deflation rather than a temporary external shock. This trend resembles the period from 1998 to 1999, where the GDP deflator was negative for nine consecutive quarters [para. 2].
Unlike historical instances where deflation was driven primarily by fluctuations in agricultural and industrial product prices, the current situation sees the service sector also exhibiting deflation. In Q1 2024, the service sector deflator fell to -0.1%, the first negative growth observed since 1993. Out of nine service sub-sectors, five showed negative deflators, one was neutral, and only three experienced inflation below 2%, highlighting widespread deflationary pressures in the service industry [para. 3].
China's Producer Price Index (PPI) has shown negative growth for 18 consecutive months since October 2022. This trend closely mirrors the Industrial GDP Deflator. Historically, during periods from March 2012 to August 2016 and June 1997 to December 1999, the PPI remained negative for extended durations. Currently, 26 out of 40 industrial sub-sectors are experiencing negative PPI growth. The length of this deflationary period is nearing historical episodes of prolonged industrial deflation [para. 4].
Despite the significant deflationary pressures, nominal GDP growth remains the lowest outside of 2020 since China's reform and opening-up period, primarily because the real GDP growth rate at such times often exceeded 7%, allowing for 6%-7% nominal GDP growth, unlike the present scenario [para. 5]. Severe deflation often adversely affects corporate revenue and profits. For example, in 2015, Chinese industrial enterprises' profits fell by 2.3%. Conversely, in Q1 2024, industrial profits grew by 4.3%, but the sustenance of this growth amidst persistent deflation is uncertain. There is also a concern that if deflation spreads further into the service sector, the overall profit situation could worsen, affecting corporate profits, personal incomes, and government tax revenues even if actual GDP growth meets targets [para. 6].
Current deflation is largely due to insufficient aggregate demand. Supply-side data has shown strong growth since late 2023, but demand-side data, like real estate and consumption, is weaker. While electric vehicles and tourism have seen growth post-pandemic, tourism growth is hitting a bottleneck, and real estate sales have notably declined. Other consumption sectors are also growing sluggishly, and investment growth remains subdued [para. 7]. The imbalance stems from years of focusing on high-tech industry development while neglecting overall demand. Export growth is insufficient to absorb the new production capacity in the long run, given China's economic scale. Furthermore, the disparity between China’s manufacturing output and consumption underscores the risk of escalating conflicts with trade partners and increasing domestic deflationary pressures. These dual challenges need to be factored in when formulating future economic policies [para. 8].
- Aletheia Capital
Aletheia Capital - Aletheia Capital is a financial research firm. The author of the article is a China strategy analyst at Aletheia Capital, providing insights into economic trends and potential risks. The firm likely focuses on delivering investment research and strategic analysis, particularly regarding economic conditions and market dynamics.
- PODCAST
- MOST POPULAR