Will Certification Be Required to Access the Internet? New Regulations Open for Public Comment by Two Departments (AI Translation)
Listen to the full version


文|财新 黄雨馨
By Huang Yuxin, Caixin
【财新网】今后需要持证上网了吗?公安部、国家网信办共同起草的《国家网络身份认证公共服务管理办法(征求意见稿)》(下称“征求意见稿”)正在公开征求意见,相关内容引发公众诸多关注及疑问。
Caixin Online—Will internet users need a license going forward? The Ministry of Public Security and the Cyberspace Administration of China have jointly drafted the "National Public Service Management Measures for Network Identity Authentication (Draft for Comment)" (hereinafter referred to as "Draft for Comment"), which is currently open for public consultation. The contents of this draft have sparked significant public attention and questions.
征求意见稿共16个条文,核心内容是为社会公众统一签发“网号”“网证”,提供以法定身份证件信息为基础的真实身份登记、核验服务,“达到方便人民群众使用、保护个人信息安全、推进网络可信身份战略的目标”。
The draft for public consultation consists of 16 articles, with its core aim being to issue "web IDs" and "web certificates" uniformly for the general public. These would provide real identity registration and verification services based on statutory identification document information, to "facilitate public use, protect personal information security, and promote a strategy of trustworthy online identities."
有研究网络法的学者向财新解释说,此举是给了公众多一个选择,由公权力部门来收集个人信息,但不向互联网平台企业提供,以解决目前过度收集个人信息、侵犯个人隐私的问题。另有学者表示,这份文件只是一部效力层级较低的部门规章,将网络实名认证的方式统一为通过“网号”与“网证”进行,并无上位法依据。防止平台超范围收集个人信息、防止泄露个人信息和数据,可以通过其他制度实现。
A scholar who specializes in network law explained to Caixin that this move gives the public an additional option: letting public authorities collect personal information instead of internet platform companies. This approach aims to address issues of excessive personal information collection and privacy invasion. However, another scholar pointed out that this document is merely a lower-tier departmental regulation that standardizes network real-name authentication through "network numbers" and "network certificates," without a higher-level legal basis. The prevention of platforms excessively collecting personal information and leaking personal data can be achieved through other mechanisms.

- DIGEST HUB
- China is drafting "National Public Service Management Measures for Network Identity Authentication" for public consultation, proposing "Net IDs" and "Net Certificates" to standardize online real-name authentication.
- The initiative aims to protect personal information and reduce over-collection by internet platforms, allowing users to opt for state-managed verification instead.
- Scholars express concerns about privacy risks, potential overreach, and lack of higher legal basis for the new system. Public feedback is open until August 25, 2024.
The Ministry of Public Security and the Cyberspace Administration of China have jointly released a "Draft for Comment" for the "National Public Service Management Measures for Network Identity Authentication," aimed at standardizing identity verification online through introducing "Net IDs" and "Net Certificates." These measures seek to provide real identity registration and verification services based on statutory identification document information, thereby reducing personal information collection by internet platforms [para. 1].
The draft proposes the issuance of "Net IDs," which are network identity symbols composed of letters and numbers uniquely corresponding to an individual’s identity information but without explicit personal identification information, and "Net Certificates," which are authentication credentials that carry the "Net ID" and non-plain-text personal identity information. This allows users to verify their identities without disclosing plain-text personal information, reducing privacy invasion concerns [para. 2].
The draft includes four key aspects: defining the concepts of "online number" and "online certificate," specifying usage methods and scenarios, emphasizing data and personal information protection obligations, and outlining legal responsibilities for violations [para. 3]. Article 3 establishes that the Ministry of Public Security and the Cyberspace Administration of China are responsible for supervising the implementation of these measures [para. 4].
The voluntary nature of the system is emphasized, allowing individuals to apply for "Net IDs" and "Net Certificates" at their discretion. Regulatory agencies are encouraged to promote these measures to foster a secure identity verification ecosystem [para. 5]. Article 8 specifies that internet platforms do not need to retain users’ legal identification information beyond what is essential and with user consent, aiming to minimize data collection [para. 6].
Zhao Peng from the China University of Political Science and Law views the draft as offering an alternative to internet platforms who might abuse real-name registration systems for excessive data collection [para. 7]. However, he cautions that the implementation should not force users into these systems by making them essential for internet access, a sentiment echoed by Peking University’s Shen Kui. Shen emphasizes that fewer entities collecting personal identification information could reduce the risk of data breaches [para. 8][para. 9].
However, the draft faces scrutiny regarding its proportionality and potential to infringe on personal privacy. Critics like Peking University's Zhao Hong highlight that state agencies could potentially mismanage personal data, just like private entities, and raise concerns about unnecessary bureaucracy in administrative management [para. 10]. Tsinghua University’s Lao Dongyan further argues that extending systems meant for criminal investigation to the general populace without legal backing constitutes overreach [para. 11][para. 12].
Shen Kui adds that mandatory use of "Net IDs" and "Net Certificates" could lead to users experiencing a convergence of their fragmented online presence into a single, comprehensively monitored profile, leading to self-censorship and limiting the vibrancy of the digital economy [para. 13]. The draft proposes regulations to address over-collection and data leaks through other means, questioning the necessity and proportionality of the outlined measures [para. 14].
Public feedback on this draft is solicited by the Ministry of Justice until August 25, 2024, with submissions accepted via its official website, email, or traditional mail [para. 15].
- Before August 25, 2024:
- Deadline for feedback on opinions and suggestions for the 'National Public Service Management Measures for Network Identity Authentication (Draft for Comment)'
- PODCAST
- MOST POPULAR