Caixin
Nov 09, 2024 02:13 PM
CAIXIN WEEKLY SNEAK PEEK

How Did a Retired Executive Judge Commit Fraud? (AI Translation)

00:00
00:00/00:00
Listen to this article 1x
This article was translated from Chinese using AI. The translation may contain inaccuracies. Click the button on the right to hide or reveal the original version.
2024年7月8日,重庆市第二中级人民法院执行局联合云阳县人民法院、南溪人民法庭开展的“渝理面对面”“渝诉快执”App乡间行,在南溪集镇利用车载便民法庭为社区居民进行推广、咨询服务。这是工作人员向群众解释“执行老赖”和“悬赏公告”的发布规则,以及什么是悬赏执行。图:饶国君/IC PHOTO
2024年7月8日,重庆市第二中级人民法院执行局联合云阳县人民法院、南溪人民法庭开展的“渝理面对面”“渝诉快执”App乡间行,在南溪集镇利用车载便民法庭为社区居民进行推广、咨询服务。这是工作人员向群众解释“执行老赖”和“悬赏公告”的发布规则,以及什么是悬赏执行。图:饶国君/IC PHOTO

文|财新周刊 单玉晓

By Dan Yuxiao, Caixin Weekly

  2021年3月底,北京致优越投资管理有限公司(下称“致优越公司”)老板黄向辉,委托律师给江西省赣州市中级法院执行局时任局长曾军打了个电话。没承想,这通简短的电话,揭开了一场跨度长达10年、金额达3700多万元、受害人数众多的骗局。

At the end of March 2021, Huang Xianghui, the owner of Beijing Zhiyaoyue Investment Management Co., Ltd. (referred to as "Zhiyaoyue Company"), instructed a lawyer to make a call to Zeng Jun, then-director of the Enforcement Bureau at the Intermediate People's Court of Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province. Unexpectedly, this brief phone call exposed a fraud scheme spanning over 10 years, involving amounts exceeding 37 million yuan and affecting a large number of victims.

  黄向辉没有在赣州中院打过官司,但一个据称在该院执行的案件和他相关。律师先是电话里向曾军说了案号和当事人身份信息,后又通过微信给曾军发了三份赣州中院出具的执行裁定书、一份执行标的款收款证明和一份清场公告,请他帮助核实是否属实。这些文件都加盖了赣州中院执行局的印章。转天,曾军查阅了法院的卷宗,发现除了案号真实存在,律师提供的当事人信息和卷宗里的完全对不上,五份司法文件也根本不在卷宗里。

Huang Xianghui has never been involved in a lawsuit at the Ganzhou Intermediate People's Court, but a case allegedly executed by this court is related to him. An attorney first conveyed the case number and the identity information of the parties over the phone to Zeng Jun, later sending him three execution orders issued by the Ganzhou Intermediate People's Court, a proof of receipt for the execution amount, and a clearance announcement via WeChat, asking him to verify their authenticity. All these documents bore the seal of the Execution Bureau of the Ganzhou Intermediate People's Court. The following day, Zeng Jun reviewed the court files and discovered that although the case number indeed existed, the litigant information provided by the attorney did not match the files at all, and the five judicial documents were not present in the files.

  白纸黑字加盖法院公章的文件居然是假的?黄向辉确定自己被骗了。骗他的人,正是曾军的下属——赣州中院执行局女法官叶红。

Was the document, bearing the court's official seal in black and white, actually a fake? Huang Xianghui was certain that he had been deceived. The person who duped him was none other than Ye Hong, a female judge in the Enforcement Bureau of the Ganzhou Intermediate People's Court and a subordinate of Zeng Jun.

loadingImg
You've accessed an article available only to subscribers
VIEW OPTIONS
Disclaimer
Caixin is acclaimed for its high-quality, investigative journalism. This section offers you a glimpse into Caixin’s flagship Chinese-language magazine, Caixin Weekly, via AI translation. The English translation may contain inaccuracies.
Share this article
Open WeChat and scan the QR code
DIGEST HUB
Digest Hub Back
How Did a Retired Executive Judge Commit Fraud? (AI Translation)
Explore the story in 30 seconds
  • In March 2021, a phone call uncovered a fraud scheme by Ye Hong, a retired Ganzhou Intermediate People's Court judge, lasting over 10 years and swindling over 37 million yuan from several victims.
  • Ye Hong was sentenced to 19 years and 6 months for fraud and abuse of power after deceiving investors into financing a non-existent hydropower asset project, exploiting her judicial position and forging official documents.
  • Victims are seeking state compensation for their losses due to Ye's fraudulent use of genuine court seals, highlighting ongoing issues with judicial enforcement and internal discipline.
AI generated, for reference only
Explore the story in 3 minutes

[para. 1] In March 2021, a routine phone call initiated by Huang Xianghui, who was the owner of Zhiyaoyue Investment Management Co., Ltd. in Beijing, unexpectedly uncovered a fraud plan that lasted for over a decade and defrauded victims of amounts exceeding 37 million yuan. The fraud was orchestrated by Ye Hong, a judge in the Enforcement Bureau at the Intermediate People's Court of Ganzhou. Ye had manipulated her position and forged documents to execute the fraud. Upon discovering this, Huang reported the case, prompting a series of investigations by the Ganzhou Municipal Discipline Inspection and Supervision Commission.

[para. 2][para. 5] Ye Hong, a veteran judge at Ganzhou Court since 1984, had retired in 2018 but was rehired until 2019. She exploited her judicial authority to deceive multiple businessmen, including Huang Xianghui, Lan Zuowen, Zhou Maoping, and Qiu Zhiqi. These businessmen were only unveiled as victims of her scheme after investigative alerts reached them in 2021.

[para. 4] The prosecution of Ye for fraud and abuse of power resulted in her receiving a prison sentence totaling 19 years and six months. Despite appealing for more leniency due to her surrendering, the Intermediate People's Court of Ji'an City in Jiangxi upheld the original judgment, finding her surrender insufficient for mitigating the punishment.

[para. 6][para. 8] Ye Hong’s deceit involved falsely representing herself as handling the asset disposal of Douyan Hydropower Station and creating various judicial documents to substantiate her false claims, leading unsuspecting business elites to place their trust and investments in her fabricated scenarios.

[para. 9][para. 11] Ye’s fraudulent facade perpetrated with false judicial credentials and documents convinced investors like Lan Zouwen and Huang Xianghui to part with colossal amounts of money. Over approximately a year, Huang wired over 12.7 million yuan to Ye, while Zhou Maoping was deceived into transferring over 13.86 million yuan after buying what he thought were legitimate debt claims from Liu Hong. Similar transactions duped businessman Qiu Zhiqi.

[para. 13][para. 15] Ye’s fraudulence was not only a masterclass in deceitful documentation but also involved covering up her deceit by involving and misleading both former and current associates who inadvertently lent credibility to her scams through association or representation.

[para. 14][para. 18] A key to Ye’s success in scamming was presenting herself with court vouchers and official seals, misleading educated and seasoned investors into believing the legitimacy of her façade. In some cases, these actions took place within the premises of the Ganzhou Intermediate People's Court, further instilling trust amongst the investors.

[para. 21][para. 23] Besides guarding her fraudulent activities, Ye also wielded her enforcement powers to illegally assist in unfreezing assets for litigants, marking a grave abuse of her judicial role. This encompassed creating false settlement agreements that enabled the illicit release of sealed properties.

[para. 27][para. 30] The scandal surrounding Ye Hong revealed significant weaknesses in the enforcement system, initiating wider scrutiny and reforms within the judicial framework. This involved urging transparency, separating trial and enforcement duties, and leveraging a more robust supervisory mechanism involving parties, procuratorial agencies, and the public to ensure ethical enforcement.

[para. 32][para. 35] Ensuring comprehensive oversight and transparency in enforcement processes is now deemed critical, paving the way for future reforms to prevent recurrences of similar abuses and fraudulent activities within judicial realms. The reform directives heralded by recent sessions emphasize the need to accurately delineate enforcement roles, optimize current enforcement mechanisms, and significantly amplify public vigilance and prosecutorial scrutiny to secure more sincere and fair judicial operations.

AI generated, for reference only
Who’s Who
Beijing Zhiyouyue Investment Management Co., Ltd.
北京致优越投资管理有限公司
Beijing Zhiyouyue Investment Management Co., Ltd. is associated with its legal representative Huang Xianghui. In 2021, Huang discovered that the company was involved in a decade-long fraud scheme orchestrated by Gan Zhou Intermediate People's Court's retired judge Ye Hong, resulting in significant financial losses. After realizing the fraud, Huang reported it to the authorities.
China Great Wall Asset Management Corporation Nanchang Office
中国长城资产管理公司南昌办事处
Around 2005, the China Great Wall Asset Management Corporation Nanchang Office commissioned Jiangxi Mingli Law Firm to promote the debts related to Douyan Hydropower Station. They were involved in the asset disposal project, seeking investors for the station's debts during that period, as discussed with Ye Hong, the fraudulent judge.
China Orient Asset Management Corporation Nanchang Office
中国东方资产管理公司南昌办事处
China Orient Asset Management Corporation Nanchang Office ("Orient Asset Nanchang Office") is mentioned as having a supposed 5800 million yuan debt related to Douyan Hydropower Station. It is falsely referenced by Ye Hong, a former court official, in her fraudulent schemes to deceive businesspeople into investing money under the pretense of executing the asset's debt management.
AI generated, for reference only
What Happened When
2010:
Ye Hong began her fraudulent activities related to the Douyan Hydropower Station.
2018:
Ye Hong was rehired by the Ganzhou Intermediate People's Court after retiring in 2018.
2019:
Ye Hong's rehiring at the court ended.
March 2021:
Huang Xianghui instructed a lawyer to call Zeng Jun, exposing a fraud scheme.
After March 2021:
Zeng Jun found discrepancies in the court files, indicating fraud.
April 7, 2021:
The Ruijin City Supervision Commission began a preliminary investigation into Ye Hong.
April 8, 2021:
Ye Hong was taken into custody and confessed to her crimes.
October 31, 2023:
Ye Hong was sentenced to 19 years and 6 months in prison by the Suichuan County Court.
Two months after October 31, 2023:
The Intermediate People's Court of Ji'an City dismissed Ye Hong's appeal and upheld the original judgment.
AI generated, for reference only
Subscribe to unlock Digest Hub
SUBSCRIBE NOW
PODCAST
China Business Uncovered Podcast: Inside the Fall of ‘China’s LVMH’
00:00
00:00/00:00