Caixin Weekly | Border Trade Rife with Black and Gray Markets, Regulatory Gaps in Urgent Need of Patching (AI Translation)
Listen to the full version

文|财新周刊 冯奕铭
By Feng Yiming, Caixin Weekly
文|财新周刊 冯奕铭
By Feng Yiming, Caixin Weekly
“我们做的是地方政府鼓励的事,为什么会被说成是走私?”时至今日,邹叶还是困惑不解。
"We are doing what the local government encourages, so why are we being accused of smuggling?" To this day, Zou Ye remains puzzled.
邹叶的丈夫在云南省普洱市孟连口岸经营一家口岸运营公司,该公司于2018年7月进驻连接中国云南与缅甸的货运通道——芒信通道,投入1500万元建设了边民互市市场和查验货场。但2023年9月,海关缉私以伪报贸易方式走私普通货物的罪名,拘捕了包括她丈夫在内的五名责任人员。
Zou Ye's husband operates a port management company at Menglian Port in Pu'er City, Yunnan Province. In July 2018, the company entered the Mangxin Passage, a freight corridor linking Yunnan, China with Myanmar, investing 15 million yuan to establish a border trade market and inspection yard. However, in September 2023, customs anti-smuggling authorities arrested five responsible individuals, including her husband, on charges of smuggling ordinary goods by falsifying trade methods.
- DIGEST HUB
- Zou Ye’s husband’s company was accused of smuggling due to exploiting customs loopholes and falsifying trade methods at a border trade market in Yunnan, China.
- Border trade relies on local residents using tax-free quotas for trade, which has shifted to digital platforms, increasing customs evasion.
- China's customs laws face challenges with uncoordinated regulations, smuggling issues, and the evolving role of local residents and cooperatives in border trade logistics.
Zou Ye's husband operates a port management company at Menglian Port in Yunnan Province, China. In 2018, their company invested 15 million yuan to establish a border trade market and inspection yard through the Mangxin Passage, a freight corridor linking China and Myanmar. Surprisingly, in 2023, customs authorities accused five individuals, including Zou Ye’s husband, of smuggling through deceptive trade methods. The company aimed to facilitate logistics; however, during the pandemic, the trade volume surged, leading to customs investigations revealing involvement of entities beyond border residents. [para. 1]
Border trade practices have specific policies that exempt border residents from import duties on goods valued below 8,000 yuan per day. During the pandemic, many border residents helped declare imports for goods owners in exchange for a small fee, suggesting issues within the trade system resting on border residents' allowances. From 2016 to 2021, 119 verdicts related to border trading smuggling were published, highlighting the gray areas exploited by some businesses. These operations usually involve local residents moving goods across the border in small quantities, closer to smuggling, than legitimate trade. [para. 2][para. 3]
Despite systemic issues, digital platforms have made it easy for border residents to declare imports. Some regions have thus become susceptible to smuggling and customs evasion. The growing scale of cross-border trade markets presents challenges of regulatory oversight, even as local governments implement policies like “cross-border trading plus local processing.” The objective here is to boost economic growth by transitioning from a "channel economy" to a "port economy." However, effective governance is continuously challenged by rampant disorder within these markets. [para. 4][para. 5]
Efforts are underway to update the "Border Trade Management Measures" to standardize and support on-site processing policies better. Concurrently, the Chinese government is launching initiatives promoting stable foreign trade growth, focusing on advancing border trade development and processing imports locally. Meanwhile, Vietnam is implementing restrictions on duty-free border trade, which by 2030 will shift all trade procedures to major ports, creating another challenge for China's border trade. [para. 6][para. 7]
Trade through the Mangxin Passage, crucial for goods like sugarcane and coal, experienced substantial growth during the pandemic. Despite this, irregularities in trade practices persisted, as border trade corridors became synonymous with tactical evasion of customs duties. Conflicting responsibilities between facilitators like Zou Ye’s company and the involved goods owners compound enforcement complexities. This discrepancy underscores the challenge in regulating border commerce authentically reliant on local resident trade. [para. 8]
Governments have encouraged “border trade plus local processing” that entails residents sourcing goods for local processing with imported items sold to processing plants. This approach, though fostering economic zones, poses practical challenges. The outlined presence of a 9% VAT adjustment in some provinces notably enhances industrial attractiveness. However, the model remains subject to misuse, demonstrated by cases of local enterprises falsely claiming imports under resident trade exemptions. [para. 9]
Investigations by customs authorities into resident-involved smuggling cases have emerged, with companies misreporting trade transactions being targeted. China's revised preventative measures aim to ensure legitimate trade and policy benefits continue aiding local economies. However, the divided responsibilities between residents and multinational enterprises perpetuate a "cat and mouse game," complicating customs' enforcement efforts and the efficient distribution of regulatory adjustments. [para. 10]
The overall effectiveness of these complex systems reflects in Hekou, Yunnan, where government-backed platforms facilitate cross-border procurement with VAT incentives stimulating business viability. Neighboring nations like Vietnam pose additional challenges by limiting trade flexibility. Operational efficiency improvements, coupled with impending regional changes, compel urgent compliance enforcement to sustain border trade viability. [para. 11]
- Zanmei Industrial
- Zanmei Industrial, a company in Guangxi, was implicated in a major smuggling case in 2018. Despite being a previously praised firm for its local contributions, it was found using border trade policies to smuggle cashews, evading taxes worth 100 million yuan. Company leaders were arrested, highlighting issues with border trade regulations and enforcement.
- China Construction Bank
- China Construction Bank is the only major bank offering settlement services for border trade in the "Bianmin Hushi" (border resident trade) scheme. A source close to a local branch noted that during trade transactions, there are instances of bank accounts being frozen or deducted. While the policy supports this trade, there are uncertainties in its implementation.
- Beijing DHH Law Firm
- Beijing DHH Law Firm is mentioned in the article in relation to senior equity partner Lin Qian, who provided statistics on cross-border trade smuggling cases between 2016 and 2021. The firm is involved in legal analysis and handling cases concerning smuggling crimes related to border trade, especially in regions like Guangxi, Yunnan, and Hunan, and provides legal expertise in the complexities of border trade regulations.
- Beijing Lianggao Law Firm
- The article mentions Beijing Lianggao (or Two High) Law Firm, specifically attorney Shao Dan, who previously served as a customs attorney. Shao is noted for explaining that customs relies on risk management alerts and market analysis to detect smuggling cases, particularly those involving border trade, focusing on enterprises with apparent low-priced import strategies.
- PODCAST
- MOST POPULAR



