Wu Jinglian, 95: Germany's Economic Debate Worthy of Our Serious Study (AI Translation)
Listen to the full version


文|财新 王石玉
By Caixin's Wang Shiyu
【财新网】3月25日,《经济学的未来:来自德国学术界的回答》一书在北京大学国家发展研究院作新书发布,将德国学术界从2009年开始、一直延续到当下的理论和政策大争论带到了中国。
[Caixin] On March 25, the book *The Future of Economics: Responses from the German Academic Community* was launched at Peking University's National School of Development, bringing to China the major theoretical and policy debates that have persisted within the German academic community since 2009.
这场争论引起了95岁高龄的吴敬琏的关注。
This debate has caught the attention of 95-year-old Wu Jinglian.
21世纪以来,全球经济既经历了扩张也经历了曲折和危机,相应地,学术界也经历了一场关于经济增长动力、发展模式、危机应对、乃至经济学和社会学基本理论的大讨论。这场讨论既发生在太平洋彼岸的美国,也发生在亚欧大陆另一侧的欧洲经济发动机德国。中国学界和业界比较关注和了解前者,对后者相对陌生。
Since the start of the 21st century, the global economy has experienced both expansion and periods of turbulence and crisis. Correspondingly, academia has engaged in broad debates on the drivers of economic growth, development models, crisis response strategies, and even the foundational theories of economics and sociology. These discussions have taken place not only across the Pacific in the United States but also in Germany, the economic engine of the Eurasian continent. While China's academic and business communities are relatively familiar with the former, they remain less acquainted with the latter.

- DIGEST HUB
- The book *The Future of Economics* highlights Germany's economic debates between ordoliberalism and Keynesianism from 2009 to 2019, featuring Chinese economist Wu Jinglian's insights.
- Ordoliberalism emphasizes market order with limited government intervention, foundational for Germany's economic success post-WWII and contrasting with Keynesian policies.
- Wu advocates studying Germany's experiences, noting recent shifts toward Keynesian approaches have led to stagnation, rekindling calls for ordoliberal reforms to ensure economic stability.
[para. 1] On March 25, the book *The Future of Economics: Responses from the German Academic Community* was introduced at Peking University's National School of Development. The book, co-edited by Lars Feld and Hu Kun, explores key economic debates in German academia from 2009 to 2019, highlighting the divergence between ordoliberalism and Keynesian economics. Chinese economist Wu Jinglian regards this debate as essential for Chinese economists to study. He wrote the book's preface and emphasized the need to learn from Germany’s economic experiences.
[para. 2] The origins of the German debate trace back to the University of Cologne replacing its ordoliberalism-based courses with Keynesian macroeconomics, leading to wider discussions on the future of Germany’s economy and society. The debate split economists into two camps: supporters of Germany’s historically rooted ordoliberalism and advocates of adopting Anglo-Saxon economics. Ordoliberalism, unique to Germany, focuses on maintaining market order through government-backed frameworks without direct intervention in market activities. Wu highlights the debate’s core as addressing whether Germany should adhere to ordoliberalism or adopt Keynesian principles for its economic future.
[para. 3] Ordoliberalism emerged in the 1930s during Nazi rule as economists opposed restrictive state-controlled policies. In the post-war period, Ludwig Erhard implemented ordoliberal principles by liberalizing prices and introducing the Deutsche Mark in 1948, laying the foundation for the "German Economic Miracle" and shaping Germany’s social market economy.
[para. 4] Wu Jinglian elaborated on ordoliberalism’s distinctiveness, underscoring its belief that free markets require specific institutional conditions provided by a market-friendly government, such as the rule of law and property protection. However, this approach avoids excessive government intervention in businesses. Wu believes these lessons are relevant to today’s debates about market-government roles, arguing against polarizing views that suggest governments should "control everything" or do "nothing at all."
[para. 5] Germany’s journey through economic reforms was turbulent. By the 1960s, faced with economic fluctuations, Germany adopted Keynesian-inspired expansionary policies for short-term benefits. However, prolonged interventions led to stagflation in the 1970s, resulting in policy corrections under the Kohl administration in the 1980s, reviving ordoliberalism and sustainable economic growth.
[para. 6] Wu also noted comparisons between Germany and Japan following the 1985 Plaza Accord. Japan pursued expansive monetary policies that ultimately led to a financial collapse, stagnating its economy. In contrast, Germany adhered to ordoliberal principles, avoiding harmful monetary expansions and achieving smoother recoveries from crises. This adherence helped Germany avoid prolonged downturns and foster economic resilience.
[para. 7] Despite its historical success, Germany’s economic policies took a "leftward shift" after 2012, adopting Keynesian-style measures such as monetary expansions and relaxed debt limitations. This shift contributed to economic stagnation, with the German economy contracting for two consecutive years in 2023 and 2024. Wu observed that the German academic community, once critical of ordoliberalism, is now re-evaluating its importance, with many economists calling for its revival.
[para. 8] Wu stressed that theoretical debates, like those outlined in *The Future of Economics*, directly impact real-world economies. He questioned whether Germany will undertake new institutional and structural reforms to restore economic stability, emphasizing the broader implications for global economics. Wu concluded by urging economists to focus on how theories align with and address practical realities, fulfilling the discipline’s responsibility to guide effective policymaking.
- PODCAST
- MOST POPULAR