One of the Latest Cover Stories | Seven Days that Shook the Trade World (AI Translation)
Listen to the full version


文|财新周刊 路尘 王晶 侯吴婷 胡暄
By Caixin Weekly's Lu Chen, Wang Jing, Hou Wuting, Hu Xuan
文|财新周刊 路尘 王晶 侯吴婷 胡暄
By Caixin Weekly’s Lu Chen, Wang Jing, Hou Wuting, Hu Xuan
从美东时间4月2日美国总统特朗普宣布向所有贸易伙伴征收“对等关税”,到4月9日宣布暂停大部分“对等关税”,是震撼贸易世界的七天。七天之间,特朗普信誉扫地,图穷匕见;全球金融和大宗商品市场经历大地震;而世界贸易体系似再也难以回到从前。
From April 2, when U.S. President Donald Trump announced the imposition of "reciprocal tariffs" on all trading partners, to April 9, when he announced the suspension of most of those tariffs, a span of seven days shook the global trade world. In that week, Trump's credibility was shattered, exposing his true intentions; global financial and commodity markets underwent a seismic upheaval; and the world trading system might never return to its previous state.
这场贸易战,是迎来了开始的结束还是结束的开始?
Is This Trade War the Beginning of the End or the End of the Beginning?

- DIGEST HUB
- From April 2–9, 2025, Donald Trump's reciprocal tariffs triggered global economic turmoil, leading to major stock market downturns, international disputes, and retaliatory measures from countries such as China, the EU, and Canada.
- Affected nations, including Vietnam, Japan, and the EU, initiated negotiations or countermeasures while Trump raised tariffs on China to 125%, exacerbating trade tensions.
- Global economic forecasts suggest heightened risks of stagflation or recession, with U.S. policies prompting nations to explore alternative trade alignments amidst widespread uncertainty.
The summary of the content is as follows:
The global trade system faced turmoil between April 2 and April 9, 2025, as former U.S. President Donald Trump announced and then suspended "reciprocal tariffs" targeting over 180 countries and regions. Initially, tariffs exceeding 10% targeted one-third of U.S. trading partners, with China facing rates as high as 104%, creating heightened geopolitical and economic tensions. Within days, the European Union, China, and other countries retaliated with their own tariffs or countermeasures, signaling an imminent trade war [para. 1][para. 3].
The announcement caused dramatic financial market declines. By April 3, U.S. markets shed $3.1 trillion in value, with indices like the Nasdaq entering bear territory. European and Asian markets also suffered, with Japan's Nikkei 225 plummeting 23% from its peak, and Vietnam's VN30 Index falling 15% by April 9. Economists warned of potential U.S.-led financial crises, rising stagflation risks, and global economic slowdowns. Goldman Sachs, for instance, lowered its U.S. GDP growth forecast for Q4 2025 from 2.5% to 0.5%, raising recession odds to 45% [para. 4][para. 5].
Although Trump announced a temporary suspension of differentiated tariffs on April 9, reducing all partners to a uniform 10% rate for 90 days, the situation remains volatile. Some proposed increases—such as raising China's tariffs to as high as 125%—exacerbate global uncertainties. Countries targeted by the tariffs, including China, Canada, the EU, Japan, South Korea, and Vietnam, have issued countermeasures, varying from retaliatory tariffs to exploring alternative trade relationships [para. 6][para. 7].
China has been central to the conflict, facing multiple rounds of tariff hikes since February. On April 10, China raised tariffs on U.S. goods to 125%. Chinese officials have remained firm, stating they would never succumb to U.S. "bullying tactics," emphasizing through both retaliatory tariffs and global diplomatic outreach that they aim to uphold multilateralism in global trade [para. 8][para. 9].
The European Union proposed trade negotiations but faced rejection by Trump, illustrating a strained U.S.-EU trade relationship. The bloc has started adopting countermeasures, including delayed retaliatory tariffs on steel and aluminum, while signaling its readiness to escalate actions against U.S. digital services or businesses under its "anti-coercion toolbox." Countries like Canada have similarly opposed U.S. policies while negotiating exemptions, such as retaining favorable treatment under the USMCA. Japan and South Korea have announced emergency fiscal measures, including subsidies or tax relief, to mitigate domestic economic fallout from U.S. tariffs [para. 10][para. 11][para. 12].
Emerging economies such as Vietnam have prioritized adjusting their export structures and improving product quality to diversify their trade exposure. Vietnam’s heavy dependence on U.S. trade, accounting for 30% of its total exports in 2024, leaves its economy especially vulnerable, with GDP growth potentially dropping to 3–4% if tariffs linger. Nevertheless, some nations, such as Vietnam and India, are leveraging the turbulence to deepen ties with China, ASEAN, or Europe [para. 13][para. 14][para. 15].
Imposing tariffs on global partners has caused political backlash toward Trump’s erratic policies, which many describe as undermining global trade stability. While some countries have begun negotiations, no substantive progress has been achieved. Trump's unpredictability complicates negotiations, with conflicting signals from his administration leaving nations uncertain about his agenda [para. 16][para. 17].
Multilateral initiatives to counter U.S. actions are gaining momentum. China, the EU, and ASEAN voiced commitments to strengthening trade ties and upholding WTO principles. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen indicated that the bloc would focus more on trade beyond U.S. markets, representing 83% of global trade. Analysts speculate that these developments may accelerate global economic multipolarity, further eroding the U.S.’s influence in shaping international trade [para. 18][para. 19].
In conclusion, Trump’s reciprocal tariff policy has unleashed economic, geopolitical, and trade challenges globally. While some temporary market reprieve has emerged, the protracted uncertainties mean risks of trade wars—and their cascading effects on global economic growth—remain substantial. Most countries now seek multilateral dialogue and collaboration to rebuild stability amidst ongoing tensions. [para. 20][para. 21][para. 22]
- Goldman Sachs
- Goldman Sachs has adjusted its U.S. economic forecasts due to the tariff policies. Following the announcement of "reciprocal tariffs," Goldman lowered its 2025 Q4 U.S. GDP growth forecast to 0.5% from 2.5%. It also raised the probability of a U.S. recession over the next 12 months to 45%. This marks the third downgrade in three months, reflecting concerns over a potential economic downturn fueled by escalating tariffs under the Trump administration's policies.
- Standard Chartered
- Standard Chartered predicts that within two years, the United States' GDP growth will decline by 1 percentage point due to the tariffs, while domestic prices may rise by 2.3%. It also projects global economic growth to slow down by 0.5 percentage points because of the tariffs.
- Morgan Stanley
- According to the article, Morgan Stanley has raised the likelihood of a U.S. recession by 2025, citing significant economic risks due to Trump’s tariff policies. The firm predicts U.S. GDP growth could decline by 1 percentage point over two years, while domestic prices may rise, dragging global economic growth by 0.5 percentage points. Morgan Stanley has also downgraded its U.S. economic forecasts multiple times, with 2025 Q4 GDP growth predictions lowered to 0.5%.
- Apple
- The article mentions that Apple, along with other major U.S. tech companies like Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Meta, dominates Europe's digital service market. It states that the EU might respond to U.S. trade actions by intensifying data regulation on these companies as part of potential countermeasures in the escalating trade tensions.
- Microsoft
- The article briefly mentions Microsoft, noting its dominance alongside other U.S. tech giants (Apple, Amazon, Google, Meta) in Europe's digital services market. It highlights potential measures by the EU to regulate these companies more strictly, including data usage investigations, as a possible response to U.S. trade policies.
- Amazon
- The article mentions that European countries are considering stricter regulations on U.S. tech giants, including Amazon, as a response to the ongoing trade tensions. The EU may focus on regulating data usage and targeting companies like Amazon under its "trade defense toolbox" or extend investigations under digital competition laws.
- The article mentions that the European Union, which imports significant digital services from U.S. tech giants like Google, may impose stricter regulations on data usage by American companies, potentially as a countermeasure in the ongoing trade tensions with the U.S.
- Meta
- The article does not mention Meta specifically. It primarily focuses on the global trade impact of Trump’s tariff policies and their effects on international relations, markets, and various countries' economies.
- Fitch Ratings
- Fitch Ratings is mentioned in the article, with its global chief economist Brian Coulton highlighting the serious economic impact of the 10% tariffs, stating that such a scenario would have been deemed disastrous just months earlier. Fitch's economic analyst Jessica Hinds also comments on Japan, predicting adjustments to its economy due to global supply chain disruptions and tariff challenges, regardless of any agreements with the U.S.
- Starlink
- The article mentions that Vietnam proposed a trade compromise with the U.S., including approving Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet service for a trial run in Vietnam. However, this initiative failed to prevent the U.S. from imposing a 46% tariff on Vietnamese exports.
- PODCAST
- MOST POPULAR