Caixin

Commentary: The Internationalization of the Yuan and the Role of Stablecoins

Published: Oct. 30, 2025  8:41 p.m.  GMT+8
00:00
00:00/00:00
Listen to this article 1x
The internationalization of the yuan largely depends on the pace of China's capital account opening. Photo: IC photo
The internationalization of the yuan largely depends on the pace of China's capital account opening. Photo: IC photo

Since the start of 2025, two developments may have a profound impact on the internationalization of the renminbi. First, since Donald Trump returned to the White House, his administration’s policies have brought tremendous instability to the global economy, significantly challenging the U.S. dollar’s safe-haven status. So far, however, the renminbi has benefited little relative to other foreign currencies and gold assets. Second, Hong Kong has enacted legislation to regulate stablecoins and is preparing to issue licenses to qualified issuers. This article will examine these two events and assess their impact on the internationalization of the renminbi.

loadingImg
You've accessed an article available only to subscribers
VIEW OPTIONS

Unlock exclusive discounts with a Caixin group subscription — ideal for teams and organizations.

Subscribe to both Caixin Global and The Wall Street Journal — for the price of one.

Disclaimer
This is an AI-generated English rendering of original reporting or commentary published by Caixin Media. In the event of any discrepancies, the Chinese version shall prevail.
Share this article
Open WeChat and scan the QR code
DIGEST HUB
Digest Hub Back
Explore the story in 30 seconds
  • Trump’s policies since 2025 weakened the US dollar’s safe-haven status, but the renminbi has not significantly benefited.
  • Hong Kong introduced legislation enabling stablecoins pegged to various currencies, including the renminbi, but capital controls and competition limit their international impact.
  • Renminbi stablecoins face challenges from China’s cautious capital account opening, existing digital currency (e-CNY), and leading payment platforms like Alipay and WeChat Pay.
AI generated, for reference only
Explore the story in 3 minutes

Since the beginning of 2025, two major developments have influenced the potential internationalization of the renminbi (RMB). First, Donald Trump’s return to the White House has introduced significant volatility to the global economy, which has challenged the U.S. dollar’s traditional safe-haven status. Yet, the RMB has not significantly benefited compared to other currencies or gold. Second, Hong Kong has enacted legislation regulating stablecoins and is preparing to issue licenses to qualified issuers. This article evaluates the impact of these developments on the RMB’s internationalization process. [para. 1]

Following Trump’s announcement of “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2, the U.S. Dollar Index, a key measure of the dollar’s strength relative to major currencies, began to weaken independently from the usual interest rate spread with other major currencies. Despite stable interest rate spreads, the dollar has lost ground, reflecting its declining safe-haven appeal, even though it remains the world’s predominant currency. [para. 2]

China has long aspired to boost the RMB’s global standing. Nonetheless, in the context of declining confidence in the dollar in recent months, the RMB has not emerged as a leading alternative. Its appreciation against the dollar in 2025 lagged behind that of most other currencies. Also, unlike the U.S. dollar’s decoupling from other major currencies in relation to bond yields, no similar dynamics have appeared in the RMB-dollar exchange rate. [para. 3]

A possible explanation for investors’ lukewarm response to the RMB is the People’s Bank of China’s tight control over the currency’s exchange rate and the government’s policy to avoid volatility. Even if perceived as a “safe haven,” the RMB’s potential for appreciation remains constrained. Ongoing deflationary pressures in China and falling domestic interest rates make the RMB a less attractive option, with the possibility of further depreciation. Persistent market skepticism about the RMB's suitability as a safe-haven currency is a significant barrier to its internationalization. [para. 4]

Hong Kong’s newly introduced Stablecoins Ordinance has garnered attention and is seen as likely to support the issuance of stablecoins tied to the Hong Kong dollar. However, because the Hong Kong dollar is itself pegged to the U.S. dollar, the broader international effect of such stablecoins may be limited. [para. 5]

Nonetheless, differences between Hong Kong’s stablecoin laws and those in the U.S. have sparked discussions regarding the internationalization of the RMB. Whereas U.S. rules limit support to dollar-pegged stablecoins backed by dollar reserves, Hong Kong’s law covers stablecoins pegged to any official currency—including the RMB—and allows issuers to hold reserves in those currencies. This regulatory flexibility allows for both onshore (CNY) and offshore (CNH) RMB stablecoins to be launched in Hong Kong. [para. 6]

Nevertheless, despite market optimism about CNH stablecoins, the outlook for RMB internationalization via this channel is less promising than anticipated. [para. 7]

Issuing RMB stablecoins may increase their use in cross-border payments, but the RMB’s share of global transactions remains small due to the entrenched status of the dollar, which has dominated international trade for over seventy years. Without a major external shock, this is unlikely to change quickly. [para. 8]

China’s capital controls further limit the RMB’s international expansion. The credibility and stability of an RMB stablecoin are constrained by China’s regulatory grip on cross-border flows and by unresolved issues between onshore and offshore RMB markets. [para. 9]

RMB stablecoins would also face competition from China’s central bank digital currency (e-CNY) and popular third-party payment platforms like Alipay and WeChat Pay. The e-CNY, as legal tender, is supported by a massive domestic deposit base (over 300 trillion yuan, or $41.5 trillion), dwarfing the overseas RMB bases available to support CNH stablecoins (about 1 trillion yuan). Third-party platforms, while different in structure, currently dominate the payment landscape due to their widespread use and consumer convenience. [para. 10]

In summary, although stablecoins could help advance the internationalization of the RMB, they are not decisive. The process remains largely dependent on how quickly China is willing to liberalize its capital account, and in the current environment, such liberalization is likely to proceed with caution. [para. 11]

[para. 12][para. 13] (Author profile and disclaimer)

AI generated, for reference only
Who’s Who
Credit Suisse
Chen Changhua, a columnist for Caixin's "Beat the Market," holds key positions at Credit Suisse, serving as its head of China research and a senior research consultant at Credit Suisse Founder Securities.
Credit Suisse Founder Securities
Credit Suisse Founder Securities is mentioned as the workplace of Chen Changhua, who is also the head of China research at Credit Suisse and a columnist for Caixin's "Beat the Market." These affiliations position Chen Changhua as an expert on China's financial landscape.
Alipay
Alipay is mentioned as a competitor to renminbi stablecoins in the payments market. While stablecoins have fundamental differences in function and technical architecture, platforms like Alipay have a strong advantage due to their widespread use and convenience.
WeChat Pay
WeChat Pay is mentioned as a third-party payment platform in China, competing with potential renminbi stablecoins in the payments market. Its widespread use and convenience are highlighted as strong advantages.
AI generated, for reference only
Subscribe to unlock Digest Hub
SUBSCRIBE NOW
PODCAST
Caixin Deep Dive: Why Singapore Sovereign Fund Sues Chinese EV-Maker Nio
00:00
00:00/00:00