Caixin

Commentary: America and China’s Two-Track AI Race

Published: Dec. 30, 2025  3:16 p.m.  GMT+8
00:00
00:00/00:00
Listen to this article 1x
The AI competition between the U.S. and China is essentially a global contest involving two forms of modernity, governance systems and industrial models. Photo: IC photo
The AI competition between the U.S. and China is essentially a global contest involving two forms of modernity, governance systems and industrial models. Photo: IC photo

Artificial intelligence is reshaping global industry and geopolitics, and the U.S. and China are its twin protagonists. From Washington’s AI Action Plan to Beijing’s comprehensive “AI+” strategy, both nations see artificial intelligence as the strategic high ground for national power, industrial might, and global rule-making.

Yet this is not a linear chase. It is a dual-track race between two systems. The U.S. excels in core technology and innovation quality; China thrives on infrastructure speed and mass implementation. This has created a technological contest where each power holds distinct, non-overlapping advantages, creating a unique state of mutual dependency and constraint.

loadingImg
You've accessed an article available only to subscribers
VIEW OPTIONS

Unlock exclusive discounts with a Caixin group subscription — ideal for teams and organizations.

Subscribe to both Caixin Global and The Wall Street Journal — for the price of one.

Disclaimer
This is an AI-generated English rendering of original reporting or commentary published by Caixin Media. In the event of any discrepancies, the Chinese version shall prevail.
Share this article
Open WeChat and scan the QR code
DIGEST HUB
Digest Hub Back
Explore the story in 30 seconds
  • The U.S. leads in AI innovation, advanced chip design, and quality of talent, but faces infrastructure, policy, and manufacturing challenges; China excels in rapid implementation, scale, and infrastructure but lags in foundational innovation and relies on foreign hardware.
  • The U.S. uses a market-driven approach, while China adopts centralized, state-led strategies; each holds non-overlapping strengths, creating mutual dependency.
  • The AI race’s future hinges on resolving U.S. infrastructure bottlenecks and China’s semiconductor constraints, with both seeking to shape global AI standards and supply chains.
AI generated, for reference only
Explore the story in 3 minutes

Artificial intelligence (AI) is driving a global transformation, with the United States and China emerging as the primary competitors. Both nations have launched ambitious strategies—Washington’s AI Action Plan and Beijing’s “AI+” initiative—viewing AI as crucial for national strength, industrial capability, and influence over international standards. This rivalry is characterized by each country’s unique strengths: the U.S. excels in high-quality innovation and core technology, while China dominates in rapid infrastructure deployment and mass implementation, creating a system of interdependence and mutual constraint. [para. 1][para. 2]

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has conceptualized the AI landscape as a “five-layer cake,” comprising energy, chips, infrastructure, models, and applications. While the U.S. leads in advanced chip design, Huang warned that America lags in foundational elements like energy, crucial for supporting large-scale AI. Notably, China’s energy capacity now rivals or even exceeds that of the U.S., putting pressure on America’s overall AI dominance and moving the competition beyond algorithms to include the full industrial stack. [para. 3]

A new normal is emerging: when U.S. companies make breakthroughs in AI models, Chinese firms quickly replicate and deploy them, enabled by a vibrant open-source ecosystem and aggressive cost control. As a result, the competition is increasingly about scale and efficiency rather than just unique innovation. China is rapidly closing the gap in models and applications and building a formidable advantage in energy and infrastructure, demonstrating that advanced chips alone are insufficient without robust support systems. [para. 4]

Each country follows a different AI development path. The U.S. leverages a dynamic market-driven system with support from tech giants and academia, but it faces obstacles in policy coordination, fragmented regulation, and restrictive immigration, leading to infrastructure bottlenecks and talent shortages. The Trump administration’s Genesis Mission in late 2025 responded by directing the Department of Energy to blend federal scientific data and supercomputing with private AI, representing a pivot toward national mobilization strategies the U.S. had long criticized. [para. 5]

China, by contrast, continues its top-down model, where national objectives are swiftly executed by state entities and local governments. It excels at rapid deployment, with large-scale computing centers and AI innovation hubs constructed at impressive speeds. However, China faces acute challenges: U.S. export controls limit access to advanced chips and other essential hardware, and heavy-handed mobilization risks inefficient investments and lack of originality in research. [para. 6]

The U.S. maintains a near monopoly on high-end chips through Nvidia and leads in talent quality—its universities produce world-leading AI experts. Yet attracting that talent is increasingly difficult due to tighter immigration rules. China, meanwhile, has outpaced the U.S. in the volume of AI patents and engineers through state-driven initiatives, powering the widespread rollout of AI applications. However, it lags in groundbreaking foundational research. [para. 7][para. 8]

Industrial deployment reveals the starkest contrast: American firms excel at high-value, cutting-edge AI products but face hurdles in widespread implementation due to a diminished manufacturing base and higher costs. In China, AI and robotics saturate industries from manufacturing to healthcare, accelerated by large datasets and rapid iteration at scale, driving continuous improvement. [para. 8]

Both countries seek to set AI governance standards, with the U.S. using controls and alliances to shape global rules, and China leveraging its domestic market and partnerships, especially in the Global South, to expand influence. The outcome of this rivalry will depend not just on innovation but on which system can more effectively embed AI into their economies and secure resilient, independent supply chains. [para. 9][para. 10][para. 11][para. 12]

AI generated, for reference only
Who’s Who
Nvidia
Nvidia's CEO, Jensen Huang, provided a framework for understanding the AI rivalry, describing AI as a "five-layer cake." He specifically noted that despite the U.S. leading in advanced chip design, it is falling behind in foundational layers like energy. Huang's perspective emphasizes that Nvidia's GPUs are currently the global standard for computing power, which is critical for AI.
OpenAI
OpenAI is identified as a leading US firm driving the market in America's AI strategy. This strategy relies on an innovation ecosystem and open economy, with the government guiding through policy and grants, but the market, led by giants like OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft, being the primary force.
Google
In the context of the US's AI strategy, Google is identified as one of the leading enterprise giants driving the market. The U.S. approach to AI relies on its innovation ecosystem and open economy, with government guidance and market forces, led by companies like Google, shaping the development.
Microsoft
Microsoft is mentioned as one of the giant tech companies leading the market in America's long-standing innovation ecosystem and open economy for AI. The U.S. government guides policy, R&D grants, and national security frameworks, but the market, spearheaded by companies like Microsoft, is the primary driving force in American AI strategy.
Figure AI
Figure AI is highlighted as a U.S. firm excelling in cutting-edge robotics. The article identifies it as part of the American strength in high-value enterprise AI and software ecosystems. However, its products are shipped in the thousands, in contrast to Chinese firms that ship industrial robots by the hundreds of thousands.
Agility Robotics
Agility Robotics is a U.S. firm that excels in cutting-edge robotics. While American robotics companies ship products in the thousands, Chinese firms ship industrial robots by the hundreds of thousands, indicating a difference in mass adoption due to factors like manufacturing base and labor costs.
AI generated, for reference only
Subscribe to unlock Digest Hub
SUBSCRIBE NOW
PODCAST
Caixin Deep Dive: Chinese Local Governments Risk Replicating Mistakes of LGFVs
00:00
00:00/00:00