Commentary: How Chinese Exporters Can Leverage the U.S. Supreme Court Tariff Ruling
00:00/00:00
Listen to this article
1x
Subscribe now
Listen to the full version
Listen to the full version
U.S. Supreme Court
The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a seismic shift in global trade policy on Feb. 20 with its decision in Learning Resources v. Trump. By a 6-3 margin, the Court declared that the executive branch overstepped its constitutional boundaries by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose broad tariffs. This ruling does more than just rebuke the White House; it fundamentally alters the legal landscape for Chinese enterprises and their American partners who have weathered years of volatile trade policy.
You've accessed an article available only to subscribers
VIEW OPTIONS
Unlock exclusive discounts with a Caixin group subscription — ideal for teams and organizations.
Subscribe to both Caixin Global and The Wall Street Journal — for the price of one.
Share this article
Open WeChat and scan the QR code
- DIGEST HUB
Digest Hub
Back
Explore the story in 30 seconds
- The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Learning Resources v. Trump that the executive branch exceeded its authority by imposing broad tariffs under IEEPA, affecting $133 billion in duties since 2025.
- The decision empowers Chinese exporters and U.S. importers in litigation, contract enforcement, and potentially seeking tariff refunds, though refunds were not ordered directly.
- Trade tensions persist, as the Trump administration may seek alternative methods to impose tariffs; businesses are advised to adapt compliance and market strategies.
AI generated, for reference only
Who’s Who
- Learning Resources
- Learning Resources, a company, was a litigant in the U.S. Supreme Court case *Learning Resources v. Trump*. This ruling, decided on Feb. 20, declared that the executive branch overstepped its constitutional boundaries by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose broad tariffs. The decision significantly impacts Chinese enterprises and their American partners involved in trade.
- Duan & Duan (Beijing) Law Firm
- Ding Jie, the deputy director at Duan & Duan (Beijing) Law Firm, contributed to the analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on tariffs. The firm is associated with experts like Ding Jie, who provide insights on the implications of such legal decisions for Chinese enterprises and their American partners, especially concerning trade policy and international law.
AI generated, for reference only
- PODCAST
- MOST POPULAR
Sign in with Google
Sign in with Facebook
Sign in with 财新