Opinion: Trump’s New Tariff Threat Gambles With Americans’ Livelihoods
In the latest threat to escalate his trade war with China, U.S. President Donald Trump has raised the possibility of new tariffs on all U.S. imports from that country. The warning came in an interview with business-news channel CNBC on July 20, when Trump declared: “I’m ready to go to 500,” an apparent reference to the $504 billion total of U.S. goods imported from China in 2017. “You know the expression ‘We’re playing with the bank’s money,’ right?”
While Trump may think he is playing with the bank’s money, he is gambling with American families’ jobs, incomes and livelihoods. There is reason to believe Trump is not making an idle threat. He is implementing all the tariffs he had previously announced this year, on friends and foes alike. And this escalation has no end game in sight — there are few signs of China doing anything that could placate this White House.
The historic logic of tariff proponents is that tariffs are needed to protect American producers from cheap imports. But Trump’s actions would force American consumers to pay higher prices for many products when there are no American companies producing such goods or even asking for tariff protection. These newly threatened tariffs would hit many consumer goods left off his previous lists — tens of billions of dollars of household purchases of smartphones, laptops, televisions, clothing, and footwear. All told, this tariff action alone would hit $262 billion of U.S. imports in 2017, or about 11% of all U.S. merchandise imports.
Because of Trump’s trade actions, American companies have already lost competitiveness in global markets. The earlier tariffs on steel, aluminum, and parts and components will reduce U.S. companies’ global sales by raising the cost of their inputs. And Canada, the EU, China and others have also now retaliated, eliminating some U.S. sales to foreign markets, reducing production and costing jobs in American agriculture and manufacturing. Yet, retaliation on U.S. agricultural exports has led the Trump administration to double down on bad policymaking. Trump is now reportedly planning to further distort markets and dole out federal subsidies as an attempt to buy silence from the American farmers hurt by his tariff decisions.
These damaging numbers will continue to rise unless Trump finds a way to resolve his trade war.
Figure 1 illustrates the types of Chinese goods subject to Trump’s tariff threat of July 20. These goods cover the remaining $262 billion of U.S. imports from China not already under tariffs or being vetted for tariffs as previously announced under the Section 301 investigation.
Capital goods and consumer products are the major targets, accounting for 46% and 38% respectively of the value of imports that would be hit. Intermediate inputs account for only 14% because most are already subject to tariffs announced previously, i.e., intermediates made up roughly 50% of the value of products on the two previous Section 301 tariff lists.
Trump did not present a rationale for his latest trade threat, but it would seem he is relying on the authority he has been exercising toward China so far: Section 301 of the U.S. Trade Act of 1974. Trump’s initial announcement of 25% tariffs covered roughly $50 billion of imports, $34 billion of which were imposed on July 6 and currently $16 billion of which are going through public hearings as required under U.S. law. He has subsequently announced 10% tariffs on another $200 billion of imports that will go through additional public hearings in August, also legally required.
One way to describe the decision to impose even more import tariffs — this time on items like iPhones, sweaters, and sneakers — would be: He is throwing good money after bad. Another way is to recall past wars that were escalated step by step, causing great suffering but no resolution until the United States backed down unilaterally.
Chad P. Bown is a Reginald Jones Senior Fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE). Euijin Jung is an Eranda Rothschild Foundation Junior Fellow at the PIIE. Zhiyao (Lucy) Lu is a research analyst at the PIIE.
Apr 09 15:37
Apr 09 09:34
Apr 08 16:58
Apr 08 13:04
Apr 08 09:33
Apr 08 04:23
Apr 07 15:36
Apr 07 12:22
Apr 07 10:21
Apr 03 18:41
Apr 03 16:11
- 1In Depth: Why There Will Be No Quick Cure for Trade After the Pandemic
- 2In Luckin Debacle, Who’s to Blame for Missing Massive Fraud?
- 3Interview: Zhang Wenhong Warns of Second Wave of Covid-19 Pandemic
- 4Germany to Buy Avigan From Japan to Fight Coronavirus
- 5Reporters’ Notebook: Our 76 Days Locked Down in Wuhan
- 1Power To The People: Pintec Serves A Booming Consumer Class
- 2Largest hotel group in Europe accepts UnionPay
- 3UnionPay mobile QuickPass debuts in Hong Kong
- 4UnionPay International launches premium catering privilege U Dining Collection
- 5UnionPay International’s U Plan has covered over 1600 stores overseas