Four Things to Know About the ‘Paper Crude’ Futures Caught Up in the Collapse in Oil Prices
After multiple investors in a crude futures trading product sold by a major Chinese bank suffered huge losses due to the collapse in global oil prices earlier this week, a blame game begun.
Some of the investors believe that Bank of China Ltd. (BOC), one of the country’s four largest state-owned commercial lenders, should be responsible for the losses due to design defects in its product and its flawed risk management. Up to now, the bank has not actually addressed such complaints.
Below are four things you ought to know about the news and the so-called “paper crude” futures in the spotlight, which Chinese banks and mom-and-pop investors both use to bet on global oil prices.
What’s paper crude?
The controversial BOC product, called “Yuan You Bao,” is a paper crude investment product for domestic retail investors, who in China are generally barred from directly investing in crude futures traded in foreign markets.
The “paper” in “paper crude” means that there is no actual oil delivered (link in Chinese) in the end, unlike real crude futures. All these investors deal with is trading accounts provided by the bank.
BOC’s product provides investors with its paper crude futures, which are linked to foreign crude futures (link in Chinese), including West Texas Intermediate (WTI) futures, a major benchmark for global oil prices traded on an exchange operated by American exchange giant CME Group Inc.
Multiple other major Chinese banks also provide similar paper crude investment products, including Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp., two more of the “Big Four” state-owned lenders.
Yuan You Bao’s May contracts for American crude futures are all linked to the May WTI contract. On Monday, the WTI contract slumped into negative territory for the first time ever, settling at a record low of negative $37.63 per barrel.
It happened to be the day that BOC had previously set (link in Chinese) for investors to settle up their May American crude futures contracts, either by simply closing their positions or rolling over their investments — opening positions for June contracts while closing the May ones. In either case, investors with long positions had to take losses, according to the bank.
One example was that earlier this week, an investor took a 9.2 million yuan ($1.3 million) loss on a 3.9 million yuan investment in one of BOC’s May contracts amid the oil price plunge, and ended up owing 5.3 million yuan to the bank, a screenshot of a transaction record circulating online showed.
Some Yuan You Bao investors were caught up in the market turmoil, as they had tried to buy on the dip when crude prices fell to $20 per barrel without expecting prices to plunge to zero and then keep falling, industry insiders said.
Was there something wrong with BOC’s product?
BOC claims that all Yuan You Bao investors need to hand in 100% margin deposits, and that there is no leveraged trading.
But that does not mean risk is low. Investors can still face situations in which they lose all the deposits or even owe money to the bank, as CME Group started on April 15 to allow the WTI oil futures to be traded and settled at negative prices.
“The product design (of Yuan You Bao) had never taken negative value into account,” one critical banker commented.
BOC’s risk management failures and practice of selling a high-risk financial product to ordinary investors without sufficient warning have been criticized.
Who should bear the losses?
To answer the question, one first has to understand that Yuan You Bao investors are not WTI crude futures investors. Instead, they are investors in the BOC product.
On Monday Beijing time, the paper crude investors cannot trade their May contracts after 10 p.m. (link in Chinese), according to product agreements. However, BOC required them to settle up at negative $37.63 per barrel, the Monday settlement price of the U.S.-traded May WTI contract, which came out at 2:30 a.m. Tuesday in Beijing.
During the four-and-a-half hour period, BOC’s own trading in the WTI contract and subsequent profits or losses had nothing to do with Yuan You Bao investors, a financier commented (link in Chinese), adding that the settlement price for them should have been some $11 per barrel at 10 p.m. Beijing time on Monday instead of the negative $37.63.
Currently, multiple investors have called for China’s top banking regulator to investigate the issue. Broadly speaking, this could become a good opportunity for financial regulators and institutions, as well as investors, to educate themselves to be more aware of risks, many market participants say.
Wu Hongyuran, Luo Guoping, Timmy Shen and Denise Jia contributed to this report.
Contact reporter Lin Jinbing (firstname.lastname@example.org) and editor Michael Bellart (email@example.com)
Caixin Global has launched Caixin CEIC Mobile, the mobile-only version of its world-class macroeconomic data platform.
- MOST POPULAR
- HNA Units’ $15 Billion in Losses Show the Challenges in Store for Restructuring China’s Profligate Conglomerates