Ling Huawei: Missions of International Organizations and Roles of China
Increasing numbers of Chinese nationals have taken up major positions in international organizations. Senior roles include those in the fields of politics, economics, finance, law, culture and technology.
When Zhang Tao, former International Monetary Fund (IMF) managing director, was appointed Asia-Pacific head for the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), he became the first Chinese member of the bank’s senior management team in its 92-year history. In August 2021, the IMF named Li Bo, former governor of the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), as its deputy managing director.
The under-secretary-general for the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs is now Liu Zhenmin, China’s former vice minister of Foreign Affairs. Qu Dongyu took up the role of first Chinese director-general of the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization. Li Yong, former director-general of the United Nations’ Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), used to be vice minister of China’s Ministry of Finance. Zhang Xiangchen, former vice minister of China’s Ministry of Commerce, is now deputy director-general of the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Chinese national Xue Hanqin is a jurist at the International Court of Justice, one of the UN’s six principal organs; Huang Huikang is a member of the UN’s International Law Commission. Zhao Houlin is secretary-general of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and Shu Yinbiao is president of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). The ITU, International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and IEC are the world’s top three international standards organizations. Chinese people are also now serving as heads of international cultural, technological and sporting organizations.
This demonstrates increasing expectations of international organizations concerning China’s role, as the overall strength and influence of the nation increases. Meanwhile, China’s intensified support for international organizations represents its respect for and recognition of the existing international order. This is quite different from the situation surrounding the surprise promotion of Chinese official Zhang Shengman to World Bank (WB) vice president in 1996, emphasizing that the time has come for China to fully and proactively engage in the administration of international organizations, and China has become a critical stakeholder and duty bearer within the international order.
Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) are mainly public organizations founded after last century’s two world wars which serve as important executive agencies under the new international order. China has participated in the founding and operation of some of the most important international organizations, including the UN, WTO, BIS, IMF and WB.
Originally designed to maintain peace, stabilize finance and relieve poverty, these systems may be imperfect but do represent a milestone in replacing the law of the jungle with effective global collaboration and coordination. In the era of growth dominated by globalization, humanity underwent its longest era of relative peace, with the lowest number of deaths, despite sporadic wars.
Over the past three decades, China, the world’s most populous nation, has made outstanding achievements in poverty alleviation and the establishment of a society moderately prosperous in all respects, thanks to its persistence in reform and opening up, and participation in the redistribution of labor during globalization and in the existing international order.
In recent years, the tide of globalization has been ebbing, giving rise to much dispute and global introspection. But the Chinese government has reiterated the nation’s adherence to the existing international order underpinned by the UN Charter, and participated in international organizations, playing a role commensurate with the nation’s strength. Its leadership has proposed the concept of a “community with a shared future for mankind.” These actions reveal China’s steadfast support of globalization and the related international order, and aspiration to continue playing its part.
What expectations should China have for international organizations? At present, the views of Chinese people from various backgrounds seem inconsistent and include long-term misunderstandings.
The traditional view of international organizations is as a second front for diplomatic rivalry. However, most IGOs with specific missions seek international cooperation rather than boosting diplomatic contention. In the long term, the mere payment of lip service cannot be effective.
Another view is that people working for international organizations should prioritize seeking benefits for China, via means such as obtaining more World Bank loans, arranging favorable staffing, promoting favorable IMF quota reform, or promoting internationalization of the RMB. However, this narrow, biased view is likely to give rise to conflicts of interest that must be avoided, and clashes with the principles of modern governance.
There is also an unspoken view that we finally have “people on our own side” now in international organizations, through whom we can seek special treatment. This corrupt custom should be abandoned.
This cognitive divide has existed for years, and although it has narrowed recently, it still remains. How choices get made in reality often depends on an individual official’s professionalism and integrity. China has begun to make achievements in governance of international public affairs. Chinese officials working in international organizations nowadays are better in terms of quality, character and implementation than they were 10 or 20 years ago, which will possibly improve China’s capabilities and create opportunities for its active participation in and improvement of the existing international order.
For example, in addition to previous suggestions on SDRs, in an exclusive interview with Caixin earlier this year, Zhou Xiaochuan, former governor of the PBOC, proposed levying a digital tax on multinational tycoons. Designed as a global tax, this could fund international organizations and benefit related fields — an innovative and constructive proposal. Only when consensus is reached at home can Chinese officials in international organizations be supported to focus on making a difference in their areas of expertise. As a professional with a long period of work experience in international organizations who has pondered these questions, it seems to me that great potential exists for us to gradually develop ways to seek the national interest while still realizing these organizations’ missions.
Ling Huawei is managing editor of Caixin Media and Caixin Weekly.
Download our app to receive breaking news alerts and read the news on the go.
Get our weekly free Must-Read newsletter.
Ling Huawei is the managing editor of Caixin Media and Caixin Weekly.
- 1In Depth: How Chinese Factories Are Finding Their Way to Mexico
- 2Four Things to Know About Chinese Policy Banks’ Extra $120 Billion for Infrastructure
- 3In Depth: How SoftBank Wrestled Back Control of Arm China
- 4Chinese Tech Giants Cut Back on Office Space in Shenzhen
- 5Boeing Pain From U.S.-China Trade War Seen in Airbus Buying Bonanza
- 1Power To The People: Pintec Serves A Booming Consumer Class
- 2Largest hotel group in Europe accepts UnionPay
- 3UnionPay mobile QuickPass debuts in Hong Kong
- 4UnionPay International launches premium catering privilege U Dining Collection
- 5UnionPay International’s U Plan has covered over 1600 stores overseas