Caixin

Trade War Monitorr, April 7: How Far Can Trump’s Economic Policies Go?

Published: Apr. 8, 2025  3:50 p.m.  GMT+8
00:00
00:00/00:00
Listen to this article 1x

Two days after U.S. President Donald Trump announced his sweeping, unilateral “Liberation Day” tariffs, Beijing hit back on Friday with a package of countermeasures, including 34% tariffs on all U.S. goods, matching Trump’s new levy on Chinese imports. China became the first trading partner of the U.S. to launch retaliatory tariffs, with Canada and the EU mulling over their countermeasures.

loadingImg
You've accessed an article available only to subscribers
VIEW OPTIONS

Unlock exclusive discounts with a Caixin group subscription — ideal for teams and organizations.

Subscribe to both Caixin Global and The Wall Street Journal — for the price of one.

Share this article
Open WeChat and scan the QR code
DIGEST HUB
Digest Hub Back
Explore the story in 30 seconds
  • In response to President Trump's tariffs, China imposed 34% tariffs on U.S. goods, affecting stock markets and prompting concerns about a global trade war akin to the Great Depression era.
  • China's stock market plummeted with significant declines in the Shanghai Composite and Hang Seng indexes, while Hong Kong continues to maintain a duty-free status.
  • Chinese industries such as textiles and cargo shipping face challenges, but efforts to stabilize investor confidence include shifts towards domestic markets and dialogue with American companies.
AI generated, for reference only
Explore the story in 3 minutes

In response to U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of unilateral tariffs labeled as “Liberation Day,” China imposed a set of retaliatory measures, matching Trump's 34% tariffs on U.S. goods with equivalent tariffs on Chinese imports. This move marks China as the first trade partner to counter the U.S. tariffs, while Canada and the European Union consider similar responses[para. 1]. China's stock markets experienced significant declines amid concerns over the escalating trade conflict, with the Shanghai Composite Index dropping by as much as 9% before closing 7.34% lower, marking the steepest fall in five years. Similarly, the CSI 300 Index saw a significant drop, reflecting a broader downturn in Chinese markets[para. 3]. On the other hand, Hong Kong has chosen to maintain its duty-free status in light of the tariff escalations, as indicated by its financial secretary, Paul Chan, who expressed an intention not to retaliate against U.S. tariffs[para. 3].

The Chinese Ministry of Commerce took steps to calm foreign investors' nerves by hosting representatives from over 20 American companies in Beijing, outlining China's stance while blaming the U.S. for initiating the tariff discord[para. 3]. The textile industry across Southeast Asia faces potential disruptions due to the tariff conflicts, with Chinese companies operating in these regions possibly having to redirect focus domestically due to the shifts in international trade dynamics[para. 3]. Additionally, the logistics industry is preparing for a decline in freight volumes and container rates along the China-U.S. trade route, as Chinese exporters rushed to front-load cargo diminish[para. 3].

China is also pushing domestic market shifts as a measure to counteract U.S. tariffs and supply chain uncertainties as manufacturers now find Southeast Asian countries less advantageous for production relocation[para. 3]. This push is backed by government support for exporters to build channels within domestic markets, which aims to lower costs and integrate trade standards[para. 3]. As the trade dispute moves forward, American tariffs may extend further to include more industries, compounding the effects on the global economy[para. 3].

Experts predict possible realignments in the global trading system, with North America potentially evolving into a unified tariff zone, even as Canada resists adjustments to the U.S. strategy[para. 3]. Countries in the Global South might see increased regional collaboration and active participation in free trade negotiations, particularly among smaller economies and resource exporters. Furthermore, regional and multilateral organizations are anticipated to carry more weight in addressing global trade challenges, offsetting some of the tensions inflicted by major economic powers[para. 3].

In summary, while Trump’s tariffs challenge the multilateral trading system, provoking retaliatory measures and unsettling global markets, there is recognition that protectionism and unilateral strategies might not hold enduring economic sway[para. 3]. Trade dynamics continue to evolve, emphasizing cooperation and market diversification as critical to navigating the turbulence[para. 3].

AI generated, for reference only
Subscribe to unlock Digest Hub
SUBSCRIBE NOW
NEWSLETTERS
Get our CX Daily, weekly Must-Read and China Green Bulletin newsletters delivered free to your inbox, bringing you China's top headlines.

We ‘ve added you to our subscriber list.

Manage subscription
PODCAST