Caixin

In Depth: Global Trade Buckles Under Trump’s Escalating Tariffs

Published: Apr. 18, 2025  4:54 p.m.  GMT+8
00:00
00:00/00:00
Listen to this article 1x

Not long ago, the docks at Yangshan Port — a deepwater gateway near Shanghai — buzzed with feverish activity as container ships raced to load cargo bound for America, rushing to beat the clock on expected U.S. tariffs. 

By April 10, the scene had flipped: containers sat idle, stranded by a trade conflict escalating at blinding speed. Ships that had hurried across the Pacific were now cancelling return voyages, while freight rates on the world’s busiest trade route plummeted.

loadingImg
You've accessed an article available only to subscribers
VIEW OPTIONS

Unlock exclusive discounts with a Caixin group subscription — ideal for teams and organizations.

Subscribe to both Caixin Global and The Wall Street Journal — for the price of one.

Share this article
Open WeChat and scan the QR code
DIGEST HUB
Digest Hub Back
Explore the story in 30 seconds
  • The U.S.-China trade conflict, marked by escalating tariffs (rising to 145% by April 10), has disrupted global supply chains, reduced trade volumes, and shaken commodity markets.
  • Multinational corporations across industries like electronics, autos, and energy face rising costs, supply chain adjustments, and shrinking profit margins, with localized production and nearshoring gaining prominence.
  • Chinese firms are recalibrating strategies, emphasizing domestic demand and regional investments, while broader tariff impacts shift global supply chain dynamics toward regionalization.
AI generated, for reference only
Explore the story in 3 minutes

Yangshan Port near Shanghai, once a hub of bustling container activity, has experienced a severe slowdown due to the escalating U.S.-China trade conflict. By April 10, cargo sat idle, shipping schedules were canceled, and freight rates fell on key China-U.S. trade routes [para. 1][para. 2][para. 3]. This turnaround highlights the growing economic consequences of U.S. tariff hikes, which surged from 54% on April 2 to 145% by April 10. President Trump’s tariffs on China have created significant disruptions to global trade, challenging supply chains, raising costs for businesses, and reducing economic growth rates [para. 4][para. 5][para. 6].

The trade tensions have triggered widespread economic challenges. Global trade growth sharply decelerated to 0.8% in early 2024, reminiscent of the 2008 financial crisis. Multinational corporations dependent on intricate supply chains face increasing difficulties, especially in sectors such as electronics, home appliances, and automobiles. Additionally, Chinese manufacturers, grappling with razor-thin profit margins, are unable to sustain higher costs, which they attempt to pass on to traders and partners, disrupting market dynamics further [para. 7][para. 8][para. 9]. President Trump’s advocacy for reshoring U.S. manufacturing may have long-term goals, but immediate damages are already prompting domestic opposition [para. 10][para. 11].

China, meanwhile, is reevaluating its economic strategies. Amid supply chain disruptions, the country is pushing for increased domestic consumption and expanding advanced sectors like artificial intelligence, electric vehicles, and renewable energy. However, challenges persist in connecting domestic output with internal demand [para. 11][para. 12]. Simultaneously, energy trade, once a growth area, has been severely impacted. Chinese imports of U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) and crude oil have nearly ceased due to retaliatory tariffs, casting doubt on America’s energy supply chain dominance [para. 13][para. 14]. Increased tariffs on clean energy components like lithium batteries and solar panels are expected to cause further price hikes in the U.S. [para. 15]. As trade barriers rise, companies globally are moving toward regionalized supply chains to avoid economic risks [para. 16].

Chinese investments abroad are also adjusting to the new trade environment. Previously rising exports of intermediate goods to countries like Mexico and Southeast Asia are slowing amid tariff disputes. Sectors like photovoltaics are in a holding pattern, while firms recalibrate investments to manage costs and navigate stricter trade policies with the U.S. [para. 17][para. 18][para. 19][para. 20]. Larger firms with plans to expand into the U.S. market face prohibitive costs and logistical challenges, forcing many to explore alternative opportunities in Asia and other trade-friendly regions [para. 20][para. 21].

Finally, multinational corporations are under sustained stress. Tariffs are raising costs in high-value sectors like cars, electronics, and home appliances. Japanese automakers, reliant on U.S. exports, face significant risks to their profitability despite some production flexibility [para. 22]. Technology firms like Apple and Samsung may experience up to a 24% hike in product prices, severely reducing demand [para. 23][para. 24]. Similarly, PC and server manufacturers, along with home appliance exporters, are reassessing production and trade strategies to mitigate tariff impacts [para. 24][para. 25]. Some companies, including Hisense and Haier, have leveraged nearshoring or alternative routes through Mexico to bypass tariffs, while others, such as Rongdian Group, pivot to European and Middle Eastern markets [para. 26][para. 27].

In summary, the U.S.-China trade war is causing profound disruptions to global trade, supply chains, and economic dynamics. Both countries, along with multinational corporations, are being forced to innovate and adapt to a fast-changing trade environment, with increasingly localized supply chains and shifts in trade dynamics shaping the future [para. 28].

AI generated, for reference only
Who’s Who
Cosco Shipping
Cosco Shipping's Yangshan terminal experienced significant disruptions as the U.S.-China trade conflict escalated. By April 10, shipping companies had canceled numerous sailings on China-U.S. routes. With reduced demand, ships consolidated trips, and many containers remained idle. An operator confirmed that cargo owners were undergoing customs clearance while unused shipping capacity led to suspended sailings.
Goldman Sachs
Goldman Sachs lowered its 2025 annual copper demand growth forecast to 1.3%, a significant reduction of 1.9 percentage points from its previous estimate, due to the U.S.-China trade war and shrinking commodity demand.
Wood Mackenzie
Wood Mackenzie is a data analytics firm that calculated U.S. LNG project costs could rise by 3% to 5% due to trade tariffs, adding investment uncertainty. The firm also noted tariffs on lithium batteries and solar panels might increase their costs by 20%-25% and 10%-12%, respectively, making the U.S. the most expensive place to build solar projects.
Antaike
Antaike is cited in the article as warning that escalating trade friction due to the U.S.-China trade war dampens manufacturing investment, risks slower global industrial activity, and leads to less efficient supply chains.
Roland Berger
Roland Berger is a global consulting firm mentioned in the article for noting that escalating trade tensions are accelerating a shift toward regionalized "supply chain spheres." Companies worldwide are increasingly emphasizing localized supply chains to bypass trade barriers, reflecting a strategic adaptation to the disrupted global economic conditions caused by the U.S.-China trade war.
GCL Technology Holdings Ltd.
GCL Technology Holdings Ltd., a leader in China's photovoltaic (PV) industry, is slowing overseas investment due to U.S. tariff policies. Chairman Zhu Gongshan stated on March 29 that the company has adopted a "temporary wait-and-see" approach to its Middle East project while evaluating the changing trade environment.
Tesla Inc.
Tesla Inc. is among the multinational corporations affected by the U.S.-China trade war and rising tariffs. The company faces pressure due to its reliance on global manufacturing for cost efficiency, with high-value consumer goods like cars heavily exposed to increasing input costs.
Toyota Motor Corp.
Toyota Motor Corp. is vulnerable in the U.S.-China trade war as the U.S. is its largest export market. While some production occurs domestically and in existing U.S. factories, short-term production shifts provide limited relief. Rising input costs due to tariffs are likely to erode profits.
Apple Inc.
Apple Inc. faces rising costs due to tariffs, potentially adding $240 to U.S. iPhone prices. This could trigger a 24% price hike and depress North American shipments by 19.2%, according to analyst estimates. Despite production bases in China, Vietnam, India, and South Korea, Apple relies heavily on the U.S. market, where 30% of its sales occur. The company remains exposed to significant tariff impacts on its supply chain and consumer demand.
Citic Securities International Co. Ltd.
Citic Securities International Co. Ltd. is mentioned in the article as having Tatsuhito Tokuchi, its former chairman, comment on Japan's vulnerability in the U.S.-China trade war. He highlighted Japan's reliance on the U.S. market for car exports and the challenges of rising input costs despite existing U.S. production facilities.
Nissan
Nissan, which produces domestically and in existing U.S. factories, has some flexibility to adapt to tariffs, but rising input costs will still erode profits. With the U.S. being Japan’s largest export market, tariffs pose a significant challenge, despite production shifts offering limited short-term relief.
S&P Global
The article mentions S&P Global data stating that 46% (7.33 million) of the 16.03 million new cars sold in the U.S. in 2024 were imported, primarily from Japan and South Korea, highlighting the significant vulnerability of Japan’s car industry to U.S. tariffs.
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. faces rising costs from tariffs due to its reliance on U.S. sales, which account for 35% of its phone business. Despite having production bases in China, Vietnam, India, and South Korea, Samsung's dependence on these markets makes it vulnerable. Tariffs are expected to squeeze margins in their phone segment, mirroring the pressure faced by other multinational corporations in high-value consumer goods amid the U.S.-China trade conflict and rising global tariffs.
Huatai Securities Co. Ltd.
Huatai Securities Co. Ltd. is a company mentioned in the article as having an analyst, Huang Leping, who noted the tariff impacts on companies like Apple and Samsung. Huang highlighted their reliance on U.S. sales and estimated potential cost increases for products like the iPhone due to tariffs, leading to possible price hikes and reduced shipments.
Lenovo
Lenovo, a global PC leader, relies on offshore assembly for most U.S. PC sales, mainly in China, Vietnam, India, and Mexico. Its capacity in Mexico is insufficient to fully meet North American demand. Shifting production takes time, and tariffs are expected to suppress demand for PCs and servers. Despite assembling some servers in the U.S., Mexico, and Taiwan using parts from places like Thailand and Malaysia, Lenovo faces challenges due to increased costs and strained supply chains.
HP
HP, along with other PC manufacturers like Lenovo and Dell, faces tariff impacts due to reliance on offshore assembly, primarily in China. Although some production occurs in Mexico, India, and Vietnam, limited capacity in regions like Mexico hampers quick production shifts. Tariffs are expected to suppress demand for PCs and servers. While some servers are assembled in the U.S., Mexico, and Taiwan, their components often originate from countries such as Thailand and Malaysia, further exposing them to supply chain disruptions.
Dell
Dell faces tariff impacts due to reliance on offshore assembly, primarily in China, Vietnam, India, and Mexico. Most PCs sold in the U.S. are assembled in China, while servers are built in the U.S., Mexico, and Taiwan using parts from countries like Thailand and Malaysia. Dell, like other PC companies, is expected to experience suppressed demand as tariffs increase costs and complicate production shifts to other regions.
Counterpoint Research
Counterpoint Research is referenced in the article through analyst Ivan Lam, who discusses the impact of tariffs on PC and server companies, including Lenovo, HP, and Dell. He highlights that most PCs sold in the U.S. are assembled offshore, with limited capacity in locations like Mexico, making tariff-induced production shifts time-intensive. Counterpoint provides insights into global tech and electronics markets.
Hisense Group Corp.
Hisense Group Corp. utilizes its TV plant in Mexico to bypass U.S. tariffs. This strategy helps the company maintain its market presence despite the trade war's impact, allowing it to avoid higher costs associated with direct exports from China.
Haier Smart Home Co. Ltd.
Haier Smart Home Co. Ltd. earns 80 billion yuan in North America, with over 80% of its U.S. sales produced locally or in Mexico, shielding it from tariffs. However, about 10% of its U.S. exports still come from China, potentially leading to a 10-billion-yuan sales loss.
Rongdian Group
Rongdian Group's Roshtaa brand has adjusted its global strategy by re-routing trade through Thailand and Nigeria and shifting from OEM to branded sales. The company sees growth in Europe and the Middle East offsetting U.S. losses, with cross-border e-commerce providing new opportunities for expansion.
AI generated, for reference only
Subscribe to unlock Digest Hub
SUBSCRIBE NOW
NEWSLETTERS
Get our CX Daily, weekly Must-Read and China Green Bulletin newsletters delivered free to your inbox, bringing you China's top headlines.

We ‘ve added you to our subscriber list.

Manage subscription
PODCAST