Caixin

In Depth: The Changing Landscape of Foreign Law Firms in China

Published: Apr. 30, 2025  8:56 p.m.  GMT+8
00:00
00:00/00:00
Listen to this article 1x
As trade tensions reshape the global trading landscape, China’s legal business is evolving, with fewer U.S. firms around to help their compatriots.
As trade tensions reshape the global trading landscape, China’s legal business is evolving, with fewer U.S. firms around to help their compatriots.

Foreign law firms have played a crucial role in China’s economic transformation.

As the country began its long process of reform over four decades ago, these firms helped foreign investors enter the Chinese market, providing the country with much-needed capital and expertise.

But now, as trade tensions are reshaping the global trading landscape, China’s legal business is changing too — fewer U.S. firms helping their compatriots enter China, more Southeast Asian offices guiding Chinese investment in their region.

loadingImg
You've accessed an article available only to subscribers
VIEW OPTIONS

Unlock exclusive discounts with a Caixin group subscription — ideal for teams and organizations.

Subscribe to both Caixin Global and The Wall Street Journal — for the price of one.

Share this article
Open WeChat and scan the QR code
DIGEST HUB
Digest Hub Back
Explore the story in 30 seconds
  • Since 2023, over a dozen foreign law firms—mainly American—have reduced or exited operations on the Chinese mainland, while Southeast Asian firms are expanding due to increased Chinese investment in the region.
  • U.S. law firm numbers in China dropped from 244 in 2017 to 205 in 2022, rebounding slightly to 208 in 2023; rising costs and local competition are pressuring foreign firms.
  • China's legal market is shifting toward cross-border dispute resolution, data security, and emerging industries, with domestic firms increasingly dominating.
AI generated, for reference only
Explore the story in 3 minutes

Foreign law firms have historically played a pivotal role in China’s economic transformation, assisting foreign investors with market entry and helping to supply China with needed capital and professional expertise during the country’s four-decade-long reform period [para. 1][para. 2]. However, recent years have seen a shift due to global trade tensions and changing business priorities, marked by a retreat of American firms on the Chinese mainland and increasing activity by Southeast Asian firms guiding Chinese outbound investment into their regions [para. 3].

Since 2023, over a dozen prominent foreign law firms—mostly American—have scaled back or closed their mainland China offices, though many retain a presence in Hong Kong and focus on consolidating rather than withdrawing entirely [para. 4]. For instance, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, one of the earliest entrants in 1981, closed its Beijing office in late 2024 [para. 5][para. 6]. Foreign law firms initially operated as consultants, assisting clients with China's regulatory environment, until regulations in 1992 allowed formal legal offices for foreign firms, albeit with restrictions on practicing Chinese law [para. 7][para. 8][para. 9]. Following China’s WTO accession in 2001, these restrictions on geographic scope and office numbers were loosened, leading to more than a doubling of foreign law offices in China over the next decade [para. 10][para. 11][para. 12][para. 13].

However, a turning point occurred during the Trump presidency: between 2017 and 2022, foreign law firm representative offices fell from 244 to 205, mainly due to U.S. firms’ closures, though there was a minor rebound to 208 in 2023 [para. 14][para. 15]. Notably, Dentons ended its alliance with Beijing Dacheng Law Offices in 2023, and Mayer Brown restructured its Hong Kong operations in 2024, pointing to ongoing industry shifts and strategy realignments [para. 16][para. 17]. Yet, some U.S. firms are expanding locally—Loeb & Loeb acquired a Beijing-based team from Perkins Coie in 2024, and Dorsey & Whitney has more than doubled its Beijing headcount since 2021, signaling continued confidence in the Chinese market by some actors [para. 18][para. 19][para. 20].

Meanwhile, since 2023, China has approved 15 new foreign law firm representative offices, featuring significant participation from British, Singaporean, Malaysian, Vietnamese, Cypriot, and Mauritian firms. Seven set up in Shenzhen, reflecting a broader pattern of Southeast Asian firms positioning themselves close to Chinese clients as China's outbound investment in the region grows [para. 21][para. 22][para. 23].

Industry experts note a transformation stemming from the rising competitiveness of Chinese companies and decreased inbound investment from U.S. multinationals, partly due to geopolitics. This has resulted in shrinking business for foreign law firms, while the slowing pace of Chinese IPOs in the U.S. and increased regulatory scrutiny—particularly following Didi’s 2021 listing and subsequent $1.2 billion fine—have further constrained opportunities. Revised cybersecurity rules require stricter data security vetting for companies with over 1 million users seeking overseas listings [para. 24][para. 25][para. 26][para. 27][para. 28][para. 29][para. 30].

Chinese law firms now match or surpass foreign firms in quality and cost-effectiveness, intensifying competition. Cost pressures are acute for foreign firms, given significantly higher salaries (a first-year associate at a U.S. firm typically earns $200,000, 8-10 times that of a Chinese counterpart), and legal fees for U.S. listings have fallen by more than half for some services [para. 31][para. 32][para. 33][para. 34][para. 35].

The growing demand is now in cross-border dispute resolution, trade, bankruptcy, intellectual property, data security, and new energy and AI sectors. While the Chinese legal market is evolving rapidly, domestically-owned firms are expanding and internationalizing, but experts believe foreign firms with adaptability and high-quality, locally attuned services still have strong growth potential [para. 36][para. 37][para. 38][para. 39].

AI generated, for reference only
Who’s Who
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, a New York-based law firm, was among the first foreign firms to enter China, opening a Beijing office in 1981. The firm closed its Beijing office at the end of 2024, leaving it without a mainland presence, but continues to maintain an office in Hong Kong.
Dentons
Dentons, one of the world’s largest law firms, ended its eight-year alliance with Beijing Dacheng Law Offices in August 2023. The two firms had teamed up in 2015 to meet growing legal demand. After the split, Dacheng became independent but remains a “preferred” law firm for Dentons in China. The decision was reportedly driven by Dacheng’s long-term development goals.
Beijing Dacheng Law Offices
Beijing Dacheng Law Offices ended its eight-year alliance with global law firm Dentons in August 2023. After the split, Dacheng updated its website to indicate its new independent status but remains a “preferred” law firm for Dentons in China. According to sources close to Dacheng, the decision was driven by long-term development goals.
Mayer Brown LLP
In May 2024, Chicago-based Mayer Brown LLP restructured its Hong Kong operations. Its partner team began operating as Johnson Stokes & Master (JSM), separating from Mayer Brown’s international business. The two sides now have a temporary association, expected to end in late 2025. Mayer Brown stated it will continue its Hong Kong presence through a new partnership focused on international and Asia strategies.
Johnson Stokes & Master (JSM)
Johnson Stokes & Master (JSM) is referenced in the article as the partner team of Mayer Brown LLP’s Hong Kong operations. In May 2024, Mayer Brown restructured, with the JSM team separating from the firm’s international business. The two now operate under a temporary association expected to end in late 2025, while Mayer Brown continues its Hong Kong presence through a new partnership focused on its international and Asia strategies.
Loeb & Loeb LLP
In September 2024, Los Angeles-based Loeb & Loeb LLP expanded its presence in China by acquiring a 17-member Beijing-based team of lawyers, paralegals, and intellectual property specialists from Seattle’s Perkins Coie LLP, including Perkins Coie’s intellectual property agency in Beijing. This move reflects the firm’s commitment to deepening its operations on the Chinese mainland despite the broader trend of U.S. law firms scaling back.
Perkins Coie LLP
According to the article, in September 2024, Los Angeles-based Loeb & Loeb LLP acquired a 17-member Beijing-based team, including lawyers, paralegals, and intellectual property specialists, from Seattle’s Perkins Coie LLP. Loeb & Loeb also acquired Perkins Coie’s intellectual property agency in Beijing as part of the deal.
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Since 2021, the headcount at the Beijing office of Dorsey & Whitney LLP has more than doubled. Liu Sirui, a global partner and chief representative of the office, stated that this growth reflects the firm’s strong confidence in the Chinese market, indicating Dorsey & Whitney’s commitment to expanding and maintaining its presence in China despite challenges faced by other foreign law firms.
Pinsent Masons LLP
According to the article, Pinsent Masons LLP is a British law firm that, since 2023, has been approved by China's Ministry of Justice to establish a representative office in the country. This move is part of a trend of foreign law firms, especially from the UK and Southeast Asia, expanding their presence in the Chinese legal market as other international firms scale back.
Holman Fenwick & Willan LLP
Holman Fenwick & Willan LLP is a British law firm that was among 15 foreign law firms approved since 2023 to establish representative offices in China. This move reflects the firm's strategy to expand its presence in China's legal market as part of the broader trend of foreign law firms entering or strengthening their positions in the country, especially amid changing global trade dynamics.
Rajah & Tann LLP
According to the article, Rajah & Tann LLP is a Singapore-based law firm that has been approved to establish a representative office in China since 2023. This move is part of a broader trend of Southeast Asian law firms entering the Chinese market to support Chinese investment in the region, reflecting closer market integration and shifting legal service demands as global trade dynamics change.
Allen & Gledhill LLP
Allen & Gledhill LLP is a Singapore-based law firm. According to the article, the firm was among 15 foreign law firms approved to establish representative offices in China since 2023, reflecting the growing entry of Southeast Asian firms into the Chinese legal market, particularly as Chinese businesses expand into Southeast Asia and seek legal services closer to their operations in the region.
Covington & Burling LLP
Covington & Burling LLP is mentioned in the article as a firm where Li Lei, an expert in M&A and U.S. national security review, previously worked at its New York and Beijing offices. Li later joined Zhong Lun Law Firm as a consultant. No further specific details about Covington & Burling’s operations in China are provided in the article.
Didi Global Inc.
Didi Global Inc. is a ride-hailing giant that was subject to a cybersecurity review by the Cyberspace Administration of China two days after its New York listing in 2021. The company was found to have illegally collected personal data, resulting in the temporary removal of its app from app stores. In July 2022, Didi was fined 8.026 billion yuan ($1.2 billion), and its CEO and president each faced a 1 million yuan fine.
AI generated, for reference only
Subscribe to unlock Digest Hub
SUBSCRIBE NOW
NEWSLETTERS
Get our CX Daily, weekly Must-Read and China Green Bulletin newsletters delivered free to your inbox, bringing you China's top headlines.

We ‘ve added you to our subscriber list.

Manage subscription
PODCAST
Caixin Deep Dive: Former Securities Regulator Yi Huiman’s Corruption Probe
00:00
00:00/00:00