1. [para. 1][para. 2][para. 3] Chinese regulators have moved to curb the use of cross-border total return swaps (TRS) by private securities funds, issuing window guidance to brokerages on June 23 to halt new business. This targets a discreet grey-area channel for domestic capital to invest overseas, following previous crackdowns on online brokerages. Existing positions may run off at maturity.
2. [para. 4][para. 5][para. 6][para. 7] This action is part of a broader campaign against illegal cross-border activities. Since its 2012 introduction, TRS in China has repeatedly been repurposed for leverage and cross-border capital flows instead of functioning as a plain risk-management tool. An executive stated the business is now a “dead end” following these restrictions, though new contracts tied to overseas ETFs are still reportedly allowed.
3. [para. 9][para. 8][para. 10][para. 11][para. 14][para. 15] A TRS allows clients to gain exposure to assets without direct ownership through a back-to-back structure involving a domestic fund, a mainland brokerage, and its Hong Kong subsidiary. Various high-leverage forms have been banned over time, including financing-type TRS (2015), "AB swaps" (2022), and Direct Market Access (2024). By end of 2024, brokerages' TRS notional principal reached 846.2 billion yuan ($125 billion), with 56% linked to offshore assets, effectively serving as a conduit for domestic capital moving abroad. Nine Chinese securities firms are approved to conduct the business.
4. [para. 16][para. 17][para. 18][para. 20] TRS has also gained traction among overseas investors seeking synthetic or leveraged access to mainland markets, particularly in sectors like AI. ProShares has filed for US-listed single-stock leveraged ETFs that would use TRS. The instrument is valued for its anonymity, as the end client does not appear on a listed company's shareholder register.
5. [para. 22][para. 24][para. 25] This anonymity creates significant systemic risks, as demonstrated by the 2021 Archegos collapse. Regulators also suspect "fake foreign capital" is routed through offshore TRS to trade on insider information, making the ultimate owner difficult to trace, though current contracts require compliance with regulatory inquiries under China's Securities Law.
6. [para. 26][para. 27][para. 28] New interim rules on derivatives trading, effective Nov. 16, establish a trade repository regime to improve transparency. However, the final rules focus mainly on onshore entities, leaving offshore investors beyond direct reach. Key proposals to aggregate TRS positions with spot holdings for disclosure were dropped, meaning the true scale of leveraged offshore exposure remains unclear.
7. [para. 29] The latest crackdown closes another grey-area route, but the deeper challenge remains. TRS fundamentally separates legal ownership from economic exposure, and unless regulators can aggregate these risks across institutions and borders, the market will continue to understate the leverage and concentration accumulating out of sight.
AI generated, for reference only
Sign in with Google
Sign in with Facebook
Sign in with 财新