1. [para. 1][para. 2][para. 3] Liu Xiang, celebrated as the first Chinese track-and-field athlete to achieve the triple crown of Olympic gold, world championship titles, and a world record in the 110-meter hurdles, recently aired a bitter grievance against the Shanghai Sports Bureau over his post-retirement placement. This hidden conflict has now reached a dramatic and absolute conclusion, exposing the deeply flawed retirement apparatus of China's state-run sports system.
2. [para. 4][para. 5] In the resolution, Liu formally severed ties with the state sports apparatus, accepting a buyout of 494,000 yuan ($73,600). He donated the entirety of 982,935 yuan in salary and subsidies received since his unofficial retirement in April 2015 to disaster relief in Xizang. His parting words were a plea for the system to change, urging the organization to consider the future of every retired athlete, treat them well, and offer flexible, diverse placement options, noting that athletes sacrifice their youth and health, often leaving with permanent injuries.
3. [para. 6][para. 7][para. 9][para. 10][para. 11] The Shanghai Sports Bureau responded bureaucratically, stating that its athlete placements strictly adhere to state personnel policies. Retiring athletes face a binary choice: accept a state-assigned job (typically as a coach, with Olympic champions fast-tracked for senior roles) or opt for a lump-sum buyout based on local average wages, years of service, and competitive achievements. Over the past decade, the city has processed nearly 1,000 athletes, including more than a dozen Olympic and world champions. These policies are anchored in a 2002 state directive.
4. [para. 12][para. 13][para. 14][para. 15] Liu effectively retired in 2015, but his official exit was delayed for 11 years, leaving him in a bureaucratic gray zone. As a highly decorated athlete, he benefited from a tacit arrangement to remain on the state payroll without being required to clock in. In 2011, he was named deputy secretary of the Communist Youth League of the Shanghai Sports Bureau, a part-time nonadministrative role. This 'on-the-payroll but off-the-job' arrangement, long considered an unspoken perk for superstars, was abruptly ended by government campaigns to tighten public-sector payrolls and eliminate ghost workers. Only in late August 2026, 11 years after he stopped competing, did the bureau formally notify Liu to begin his retirement placement.
5. [para. 16][para. 17][para. 18][para. 19][para. 20] The saga was complicated by financial disputes dating back to his active career. Liu publicly questioned why the rules were strictly enforced now but ignored when splitting his lucrative commercial endorsement fees years ago. Chinese regulations dictate that active athletes must share a significant portion of endorsement revenue with the state and coaches; once retired, financial ties should be cleanly severed. The failure to do so in 2015 created a festering wound that erupted into a public-relations disaster. Liu's donation of nearly one million yuan was a deliberate move to clear his name of ghost-worker accusations, as he maintained he never received any official post or assignment since retirement, though his passive receipt of state funds for over a decade left him vulnerable to criticism.
6. [para. 21][para. 22][para. 23][para. 24] Liu's case is highly exceptional but serves as a necessary catalyst for reform. He can afford to walk away, having earned millions in prize money and endorsements and holding lucrative sponsorships today. He does not need a state coaching salary or buyout check. This contrasts sharply with the thousands of ordinary athletes whose post-retirement survival is precarious. China's state-sponsored system has struggled to provide an adequate safety net, as evidenced by past tragedies: national champion weightlifter Cai Li died in poverty at 32, and Zou Chunlan was found working as a bathhouse attendant. These must not be repeated.
7. [para. 8][para. 25][para. 26][para. 27] Despite the bureau wishing Liu well on his new track, the underlying systemic dysfunction remains unresolved. As Liu argued, the resettlement process must be dragged into the sunlight, open to public scrutiny, with uniform execution of retirement policies. Any third path beyond the standard options must be transparent, not an under-the-table deal for the privileged few. In its final statement, the bureau promised to absorb public feedback, optimize policies, and build a better support system. The state must keep this promise, as the retirement and basic survival of those who sacrificed their youth for national glory should be a given, not a subject for social media outrage.
AI generated, for reference only
Sign in with Google
Sign in with Facebook
Sign in with 财新