China Doesn’t Rule Out Banning Initial Coin Offerings
As Chinese regulators mull ways to curb risks associated with fundraising through new virtual currencies, an outright ban is an option on the table, several regulatory officials told Caixin.
Sources said regulators including the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) and China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) are pondering oversight measures on initial coin offerings (ICOs), an increasingly popular means to raise cash or other virtual currencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum by issuing a new cryptocurrency.
Over 100,000 Investors in China snapped up 2.6 billion yuan ($385 million) worth of new virtual currencies through ICOs during the first six months this year, according to a recent government-backed study. But as ICOs fall outside existing regulations, the risk of default and of fraud has grown, while raising concerns about a potential bubble.
Currently, any company can carry out an ICO if they publish a statement of intent and have an exchange to sell the new virtual currency on. Exchanges are usually happy to host a new coin as they earn service fees and may even get an allocation of the new currency before the ICO. In some regions in China, the issuer does not even need to have a registered company or computer program for the cryptocurrency, a bitcoin investor told Caixin.
Many ICO issuers are registered as charity foundations in Switzerland or provinces in China with preferential tax policies, the bitcoin investor told Caixin. In these cases, investors are considered donors.
In early July, central bank adviser Sheng Songcheng told China Business News that the biggest problem with ICOs was the lack of information disclosure, which can lead speculators to take advantage of investors.
At a meeting on August 18, officials from China’s central bank and the banking and securities regulators discussed controlling the size of ICOs, strengthening information disclosure, requiring risk warning documents and even a temporary ban, Tencent Finance reported.
But ICO issuers argue that the new virtual currencies do not give investors equity rights, nor do they promise any future profit. They simply give holders the right to use the product. Because these virtual currencies do not represent the same promises as a stock or bond, they should not be regulated via securities law, the issuers argue.
Other governments have started to regulate ICOs. In the U.S., ICOs fall under the supervision of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Earlier this week, Canada’s securities watchdog also said it plans to treat some cryptocurrencies offered through ICOs as securities. “ICO is a liquidity illusion. As long as a product can continuously trade, its value will increase from its previous level,” the bitcoin investor told Caixin.
Contact reporter Liu Xiao (email@example.com)
Dec 14 04:16
Dec 14 04:48
Dec 13 16:21
Dec 13 14:30
Dec 13 14:18
Dec 13 14:43
Dec 13 11:37
Dec 13 10:13
Dec 13 06:16
Dec 13 04:49
Dec 12 18:46
Dec 12 16:47
Dec 12 14:15
Dec 12 14:13
Dec 12 14:37
- 1JD.com’s Richard Liu Steps Down From Key Positions, but Retains Control
- 2In Depth: How the Queen of Gree Won, Again
- 3Another Local Government Financing Vehicle Fails to Pay Bond Interest
- 4China’s Curing Cancer Faster and Cheaper Than Anywhere Else
- 5 In Depth: China’s Private Sector Support Comes at a Cost
- 1Power To The People: Pintec Serves A Booming Consumer Class
- 2Largest hotel group in Europe accepts UnionPay
- 3UnionPay mobile QuickPass debuts in Hong Kong
- 4UnionPay International launches premium catering privilege U Dining Collection
- 5UnionPay International’s U Plan has covered over 1600 stores overseas