Trade Tensions Aren’t Just About Trump, Economist Says
*Economist Lawrence Summers says China should understand its economic success has come at the expense of millions of Americans
*Former U.S. Treasury Secretary argues that talks should move beyond trade to key issues shaping the long-term U.S.-China relationship
China must recognize that current trade tensions with the U.S. are not just about President Donald Trump, former U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers said on Saturday, urging both sides to see that neither can succeed without the other.
“I do not remember a moment when I had more long-term concern about the future of the U.S.-China global economic relationship,” said Summers, speaking at the China Development Forum in Beijing.
Proposed U.S. punitive tariffs on at least $50 billion worth of Chinese goods were announced Thursday following a seven-month investigation into China’s trade practices. In response, Beijing said it planned to enforce its own tariffs on certain imports from the U.S., including fresh fruit, nuts, wines, pork and recycled aluminum.
China should understand its economic success has had an adverse impact on tens of millions of Americans, said Summers. Trump's presidency reflects a broad change in attitudes toward China, he said, quoting entrepreneur Peter Thiel on the U.S. president — take him seriously but not literally.
Economic realities connecting the U.S. and China are unprecedented, Summers said, adding that there has never been a time when the world's largest and the world's leading economy are so different. China's per capita income is just 25% of that of the U.S., for instance, yet China has leading companies in cutting-edge sectors of the economy, he said.
“Surly nationalism and anger” in the U.S. and Europe are adding to global economic woes, Summers told Caixin in an interview earlier this month. While countries should prioritize the economic welfare of their own people, they shouldn’t harm citizens of other nations with their decisions, he said during the interview, calling for “responsible nationalism.”
The biggest effects of a trade war would be psychological, with economic effects being minimal, Summers said at the forum. Talks should move beyond trade to key issues that will shape the long-term U.S.-China relationship, such as regional security, rules on data exchanges, and protocols for state activities in cyberspace, he said.
Though he could see plausible narratives in which either both China and the U.S. were succeeding or failing in 30 years, he could not see one where only one succeeds, Summers said. “Co-dependency, not by choice but by fate, is the reality of the early- mid-21st century,” he said.
Contact reporter Ke Baili (email@example.com)
Jul 30 07:13 PM
Jul 30 06:26 PM
Jul 30 03:58 PM
Jul 29 08:23 PM
Jul 29 07:03 PM
Jul 29 04:45 PM
Jul 28 06:49 PM
Jul 28 05:54 PM
Jul 28 03:25 PM
Jul 27 07:11 PM
Jul 27 05:06 PM
Jul 27 04:09 PM
Jul 26 07:29 PM
Jul 26 06:04 PM
Jul 23 08:14 PM
- 1Opinion: The Who, What and Why of China’s Regulatory Campaign
- 2Education Companies Knew Sweeping Rules Were in the Pipeline
- 3Cover Story: How Historic Rainfall Overwhelmed Zhengzhou
- 4Meituan Shares Plunge 14% as New Regulations Threaten Higher Costs
- 5In Depth: The Fall of China’s Last Bitcoin Mining Haven
- 1Power To The People: Pintec Serves A Booming Consumer Class
- 2Largest hotel group in Europe accepts UnionPay
- 3UnionPay mobile QuickPass debuts in Hong Kong
- 4UnionPay International launches premium catering privilege U Dining Collection
- 5UnionPay International’s U Plan has covered over 1600 stores overseas