Surge in Big City Rents Raises Questions About Official Inflation Figures
*The actual rise of big city rents and the rise given by the official consumer price index are out of step, with the actual July rise in Beijing rents around nine times larger than that in the index
*This has raised fears the government may underestimate inflation and make policy missteps, with some calling on the government to change how it calculates rent levels
Surging home rents in big cities have raised questions about whether the government’s main gauge of consumer inflation accurately reflects changes in rent prices.
Any underestimation of rent prices in the official consumer price index (CPI) would cause the government to underestimate inflation, at least to some degree, which in turn would raise the possibility of monetary policy missteps.
In Beijing, for example, home rents rose more than 25% year-on-year in July, according to Caixin calculations based on data from major real estate agencies Beijing Lianjia Real Estate Agency Co. Ltd. and Shenzhen-listed 5i5j Holding Group Co. Ltd.
However, home rents in Beijing’s CPI survey rose 2.8% over the same period, according to data published (link in Chinese) by the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics.
The year-on-year growth rates of home rents in the country’s CPI have remained basically steady, or between 2% and 3%, since June 2014, according to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). Analysts have described this as “miraculous” given the soaring home prices and the rapid rise of rents seen over the past few years.
The reason for the divergence in the data stems from the method government bean counters use to gauge the changes in rent prices when they calculate the CPI, analysts said.
As the primary measurement for consumer inflation, the CPI measures the prices of goods and services purchased for consumption. The NBS classifies all expenditures under one of eight groups, including housing, food and apparel. The housing group consists of four categories: housing rent, costs for owner-occupied homes, prices of construction and decoration materials, and utility prices, according to the NBS (link in Chinese).
The NBS uses an inappropriate method to gauge home rents, making the changes in rents basically equivalent to the ones in property management fees, said Guo Lei, an analyst with brokerage firm GF Securities Co. Ltd., on Twitter-like service Weibo.
China uses a cost method to calculate the prices under the CPI’s housing categories, which mainly measures changes in mortgage interest rates, property fees and maintenance fees, said Wan Zhao, a senior analyst at China Merchants Bank’s financial markets division.
This method can’t properly reflect real home prices and rents, he said.
Wan called on the government to adopt a new calculation method for gauging housing costs for the CPI to better reflect reality and better guide monetary policy.
Contact reporter Lin Jinbing (firstname.lastname@example.org)
- 1Gallery: China’s Homegrown Jet Is Ready for Takeoff
- 2In Depth: Has China’s Monetary Policy Reached Its Limit?
- 3Morgan Stanley Joins Chorus Expecting China Reopening Next Spring
- 4Exclusive: Lessons From the Chinese Silk Road Fund’s Eight-Year Journey Along the Belt and Road
- 5China Announces Tax Breaks to Kick Start Personal Pensions Market
- 1Power To The People: Pintec Serves A Booming Consumer Class
- 2Largest hotel group in Europe accepts UnionPay
- 3UnionPay mobile QuickPass debuts in Hong Kong
- 4UnionPay International launches premium catering privilege U Dining Collection
- 5UnionPay International’s U Plan has covered over 1600 stores overseas