1. On Aug. 23, Singapore Prime Minister Lawrence Wong announced the SG Child Support Package, a sweeping demographic intervention providing up to S$69,500 ($54,688) per child up to age 17 [para. 1]. Effective April 2027, it equalizes benefits across birth orders and includes out-of-wedlock children, replacing the older tiered system [para. 2]. The move is a desperate bid to reverse catastrophic demographic decline, and a profound warning for China [para. 2][para. 3].
2. Singapore's journey illustrates limits of state intervention: in the 1970s Lee Kuan Yew's “two is enough” controls saw fertility fall to 1.61 by 1985 [para. 4]. Lee reversed in 1986 urging three or more children, but despite decades of generous incentives, decline proved irreversible [para. 5]. By 2025 TFR fell to 0.87, lowest since independence, with early 2026 data suggesting further declines [para. 6]. South Korea currently holds the lowest-birthrate title, but aggressive subsidies—58% of per capita GDP per child—raised fertility from 0.72 (2023) to 0.75 (2024), 0.8 (2025), projected 0.9 (2026) [para. 7][para. 8].
3. Beijing must pay close attention. China's restrictive policies lasted half a century and were ruthlessly enforced, unlike Singapore's brief, mild controls [para. 9]. Singapore reversed at fertility 1.6; China waited until 2021, when it was below 1.3, and today it hovers dangerously close to 1.0 [para. 10]. Without drastic intervention, China will sink below both South Korea and Singapore [para. 10]. Unlike Singapore, China cannot rely on immigration; with 1.4 billion people, it must solve the crisis internally [para. 11]. The root cause is economic: society reaps long-term benefits from children while individual families bear immediate, crushing costs [para. 11].
4. Parenting must become a financially viable profession, with families raising three or more children receiving stable income comparable to a full-time job [para. 12]. Current child care subsidies are inadequate: matching South Korea's 25% rebound requires 4.8% of per capita GDP in subsidies, roughly 855 yuan ($127) monthly per child until age 6 [para. 13]. For replacement levels, Beijing must offer up to 3,000 yuan monthly for a third child, or 1,500-2,000 yuan per child to age 18 [para. 14].
5. Funding this rescue requires a strategic shift: China has poured trillions into physical infrastructure, and must now redirect funds from bridges and railways toward human capital [para. 15]. This transition from “hard infrastructure” to “human infrastructure” is the highest-return, lowest-risk macroeconomic decision available [para. 15]. The government should issue long-term demographic bonds to establish a national child care fund, aligning immediate child-rearing costs with future tax revenues [para. 16].
6. Financial subsidies must be paired with robust, universally accessible childcare. Fewer than 8% of Chinese infants and toddlers under age 3 are enrolled in day care, compared with over 50% in many Western nations; China must invest urgently in universal early childhood care and extend preschool coverage [para. 17]. Reversing demographic decline is a generational obligation and an immediate economic imperative: a public goal of 15 million to 20 million annual births within 15 years would restore domestic confidence, stimulate consumption, and pivot the economy upward [para. 18].
7. China's long-term national strength hinges entirely on overcoming the ultra-low fertility trap; with decisive action, it can become the first major global power to successfully solve the demographic crisis [para. 19]. (The author, Liang Jianzhang, is a professor at Peking University's Guanghua School of Management and executive chairman of Trip.com Group [para. 20].)
AI generated, for reference only
Sign in with Google
Sign in with Facebook
Sign in with 财新