1. Southern China's electricity retailing industry faces severe losses. [para. 1] Nine state-owned affiliated retailers in Guangxi warn they could lose 5 billion yuan ($747 million) this year [para. 2], having already lost over 2 billion yuan in the first eight months and over 1 billion yuan in September alone. The crisis isn't limited to the south; wholesale prices also exceed retail prices in provinces like Anhui and Henan. [para. 6]
2. This tests China's 2015 electricity overhaul, which expanded competition in generation and retailing. [para. 3] Retailers buy power to resell, using both spot markets and medium- and long-term (M/L) contracts. [para. 4]
3. The root cause is miscalculation. Late last year, retailers like the nine controlling about 70% of Guangxi's market signed low-price deals for 2026, betting on cheaper spot purchases. [para. 5][para. 7] They forecast spot prices as low as 0.16 yuan/kWh, boosted by falling fuel costs and rising wind/solar supply. [para. 8][para. 9] But higher coal/gas costs and stronger demand pushed spot prices up. [para. 10] Retailers fixed customer deals at an average 0.26 yuan/kWh, while their own M/L contracts averaged 0.337 yuan - about 30% higher. [para. 8]
4. Impact is stark. Guangdong evening spot prices reached 1.11 yuan/kWh on Oct 13, nearly three times M/L contract averages. [para. 11] Since the southern spot market links five regions, a surge in one pushes prices up elsewhere. [para. 12] In Guangxi, losses exceed 0.1 yuan/kWh, with some large retailers losing over 130 million yuan a month. [para. 13]
5. There is debate over absorbing losses. The Guangxi companies want to pass costs on [para. 14], but former regulator Lu Yong argues retailers must bear them, as customers shouldn't pay for mistaken forecasts. [para. 15] Guangxi regulators have given temporary protection to customers whose suppliers exit, offering fallback service at average spot prices. [para. 16]
6. In Guangdong, disputes center on rebates. A floor of 0.372 yuan/kWh on M/L contracts led generators to promise rebates via separate agreements. [para. 17] When spot prices surged, payments were withheld, causing lawsuits. [para. 18] Rebate agreements total over 10 billion yuan, but disputed payments leave final losses uncertain. [para. 19]
7. In Guizhou, some retailers asked insurers to honor guarantees, but insurers refused, citing shortcomings in local market rules. [para. 20]
8. Retailers say rules limit risk management. Guangdong requires buying 90% of power via M/L contracts. [para. 21] Yang Qi suggests letting retailers choose their mix [para. 22], while Lu Yong argues M/L contracts secure revenue for generators. [para. 23] Also, over 10 provinces reclaim earnings above thresholds (0.005-0.015 yuan/kWh), constraining profits without cushioning losses. [para. 24]
9. Looking ahead, experts urge retailers to move beyond price competition by helping customers use power efficiently. [para. 25] Food processors and small manufacturers are suited to shifting usage to cheaper hours. [para. 26] Virtual power plants coordinating customer use and batteries are an option. [para. 28] However, earnings are limited - one Guangdong company made only tens of thousands of yuan annually from Shenzhen's VPP market. [para. 29] Such coordination requires intensive management [para. 30], questioning whether these services can justify investment. [para. 31]
AI generated, for reference only
Sign in with Google
Sign in with Facebook
Sign in with 财新