‘Factory’ College Prep Schools Produce Results—and Controversy
For those familiar with China’s cutthroat university admissions system, Hengshui High School is as legendary as it is notorious.
Located in an unremarkable city south of Beijing best known for walnut drinks, Hengshui High has been a springboard for more student admissions to China’s elite Peking University and Tsinghua University than any other Hebei province school for more than a decade.
And in terms of its graduating students’ college entrance test scores, Hengshui High frequently outperforms even top high schools in Beijing and Shanghai.
But the school’s militaristic, exam score-focused teaching approach is highly controversial.
It’s an approach that attracts parents passionate about getting their children into the best universities as well as investors targeting new opportunities in the education field. And the government entity that operates Hengshui High has promoted the model by opening similar schools in other parts of the country.
But critics say the model quashes individuality by forcing students to study for long hours in boot-camp-like conditions. They also claim it leaves students barely prepared for adult life after college.
Some education officials claim Hengshui High and similar schools undermine traditional schools by actively recruiting a community’s best and brightest students. The best students theoretically have the strongest potential for scoring high on China’s “gaokao, ” or college entrance exams, thus strengthening the Hengshui High model’s reputation.
In Zhejiang province, for example, educators fear poaching practices by a Hengshui High-brand school in the coastal city of Pinghu called the Hengshui High School Pinghu Campus will not only rob other schools of talented students and resources, but also push them toward adopting a gaokao-focused learning system.
The Pinghu school, which is scheduled to open next fall, is now recruiting students for its inaugural class. An opening ceremony was held March 26.
At a forum April 11 where educators discussed the impact of the Pinghu school on Zhejiang’s future, one high school principal lashed out at the new approach to learning and student poaching practices.
After warning that the new school threatened to “strangle” the entire education system, Hangzhou No. 2 High School Principal Ye Cuiwei declared, “We can’t let the ‘gaokao factory’ education model infiltrate Zhejiang!”
But it may be too late. As of April, officials said, the Pinghu school had received more than 400 student applications for 90 open slots.
Hengshui High School in Hengshui, a city of about 4 million about 250 km south of Beijing, has been launching affiliate schools based on the controversial education system nationwide since 2006. It now has 17 affiliated schools in eight provinces, with each school supported by educators, investors and local governments.
The original Hengshui High provides management support and teaching resources for each affiliated school.
The Hengshui High model has become a valuable business that maintains a strong brand image by attracting students most likely to score well on entrance exams, said Yang Dongping, director of the 21st Century Education Research Institute, a Beijing-based independent think tank.
Basically, Yang said, each school buys students with high-score potential by offering them scholarships backed by private investors.
For example, he said, a student in Pinghu whose high school entrance test score points to the likelihood of a gaokao score high enough for admission to Peking or Tsinghua could be offered a substantial scholarship. Students who eventually do get into these schools are given cash prizes, some as high as 500,000 yuan ($72,500). Since Pinghu’s tuition is set at 35,000 yuan a year, the family of a scholarship-winning student can pocket a substantial sum.
Private investors who partner with government entities tied to the Hengshui High network help build school campuses and hire teachers through public-private partnerships (PPPs). The local government partner usually provides land and buildings, while investors help pay for teachers and recruit students.
PPPs have become increasingly common in China’s education sector, according to Wu Hua, director of the Private Education Research Center at Zhejiang University. Local governments contribute land needed for a school campus with the goal of improving local educational offerings, while investors join to profit from future tuition payments and build good will among local officials with whom they can pursue other business ventures, Wu said.
Local governments usually support investors willing to sink funds into a new school, an education department official working for Fushun county in Sichuan province told Caixin.
A school with a model worth imitating can license its brand name and charge investors annual “management fees” totaling tens or even hundreds of millions of yuan, according to Zhou Guangli, vice dean at Renmin University School of Education in Beijing.
The Pinghu school is backed by the original so-called super school as well as a private investor called Guangzhou High-Tech Group and a government-backed port operator in Zhejiang called the Jiaxing Port Management Committee.
Guangzhou High-Tech previously invested in a Hengshui High-brand school in Fushun. Officials in Jiaxing, a prefecture-level city that includes the county-level city of Pinghu, hope the new school will boost area development by attracting students from nearby Shanghai.
Under the Hengshui High system, each student’s entire schedule is meticulously predetermined down to the minute. Study begins daily at 5:30 a.m. and ends at 10 p.m., with only one day off per month.
Students board on campus, eat only what’s served, and wear only those clothes — including pajamas — approved by the school. Even hairstyles are tightly controlled.
The school’s supporters say students score well on entrance exams due to superior teaching. They also call it a beacon of hope for disadvantaged students from rural backgrounds for whom the school offers a chance to climb out of poverty by helping them score well on college entrance tests.
But Zhejiang’s primary education director, Fang Hongfeng, said the model is “backward” and at odds with the province’s push to promote holistic learning.
Provincial education officials have criticized the school for recruiting bright middle school students even before they take high school entrance exams. Such recruitment practices violate local regulations.
And while many people accept the claim that most Hengshui High students come from rural families, a 2014 graduate of the school told Caixin that none of more than 100 fellow graduates had a farming background.
Researchers say Hengshui High and other super schools that focus on preparing students for the gaokao are actually exacerbating China’s urban-rural education gap.
Some 44% of the students admitted to Peking University in 2009 attended one of these schools, compared to 35% in 2005, according to a research team led by Peking researcher Hou Xiaoting. But only a small percentage of these newly admitted students hailed from rural areas, the team found.
In 2016, 120 of the 281 students from Hebei province admitted to Peking University and Tsinghua attended a Hengshui High-brand school.
Zhejiang University’s Wu said the concentration of educational resources in China’s cities — not super schools — is the main reason for the quality gap separating urban and rural education systems.
Zhejiang has been working toward an urban-rural balance by adopting reform measures, such as an adjusted gaokao system introduced in 2014 that gives students some freedom to tailor tests according to their educational interests.
Zhang Duanhong, a lecturer on higher education at Tonji University in Shanghai, said the demand for high gaokao scores is a driving force even in reform-minded Zhejiang. The only difference between the Hengshui High model and those at other high schools is the degree to which students are pushed, he said.
“As long as the gaokao remains the primary means for college admissions, the exam-based education model will prevail,” Zhang said.
Feb 17 17:15
Feb 17 14:38
Feb 17 13:20
Feb 17 12:20
Feb 15 11:02
Feb 14 18:07
Feb 14 13:36
Feb 14 10:42
Feb 13 13:34
Feb 13 09:49
Feb 12 17:51
Feb 12 14:07
- 1Coronavirus Latest (Feb. 1 - 15): Cases Surge Past 66,500 as France Reports First Death
- 2Coronavirus Study Finds Incubation Period of Up to 24 Days
- 3Even With Massive Funding, Coronavirus Vaccine Isn’t Coming Soon
- 4Coronavirus Sunday Update: Taiwan Reports First Death, Wuhan Virology Institute Denies Rumors
- 5Intensive Care Doctor Tells of a Hospital Teetering on Collapse in Wuhan
- 1Power To The People: Pintec Serves A Booming Consumer Class
- 2Largest hotel group in Europe accepts UnionPay
- 3UnionPay mobile QuickPass debuts in Hong Kong
- 4UnionPay International launches premium catering privilege U Dining Collection
- 5UnionPay International’s U Plan has covered over 1600 stores overseas