Jaguar Land Rover Wins Case Against Chinese Copycat — in China
Automaker Jaguar Land Rover PLC (JLR) is celebrating its court victory over a Chinese rival in a copycat car case that the U.K. company is calling a “first” for international car manufacturers in China’s courts.
Jaguar Land Rover sued Jiangling Motors Corp. Ltd. in 2016, a couple of years after the Chinese automaker launched its Landwind X7, a sport utility vehicle that bore a striking resemblance to JLR’s Evoque, which hit the China market in 2011. The X7 retails for about one-third the Evoque, which currently sells for around 375,800 yuan ($55,800).
On Friday, a Beijing court ruled in favor of JLR’s claim that Jiangling violated its intellectual property rights on the design of five the Evoque’s major features, including its side-body design, window outlines, and the front and rear lights. It ordered Jiangling to cease the production, sale and marketing of the X7, although distributors told Caixin that as of Sunday they had yet to receive a suspension notice.
“This ruling is a clear sign of the law being implemented appropriately to protect consumers and uphold their rights so that they are not confused or misled, whilst protecting business investment in design and innovation,” Jaguar Land Rover said in a statement.
The ruling compounds Jiangling’s woes, with sales of the Landwind X7 falling 76% year-on-year last year to 5,611 vehicles. That marks a precipitous drop from the 10,000 X7s that the automaker claimed to have sold in the two weeks after the model’s launch. In contrast, JLR sold 10,000 Evoques in China last year. It follows the wider trend in China’s car market, where total auto sales fell for the first time in more than 20 years in 2018, despite rising sales of higher-end vehicles.
This is a landmark case for foreign carmakers challenging alleged intellectual property rights violations in China. In 2004, a court rejected Honda Technology Industrial Co. Ltd.’s copyright suit against local company Shijiazhuang Shuanghuan Automobile Co. Ltd. Honda later sued Great Wall Motors Co. Ltd. over its Haval H6 model, seeking more than 20 million yuan in damages. The case remains ongoing.
Last week, electric-car maker Tesla Inc. sued a former engineer in a California court for leaving the company to join China’s Xpeng Motors, accusing him of stealing trade secrets.
Contact reporter David Kirton (firstname.lastname@example.org)
- 1Cover Story: 2008 Redux? SVB Collapse Raises Questions About Banking Oversight
- 2SVB Collapse Catches Chinese Tech Startups, Private Funds Off Guard
- 3Beijing Welcomes Ex-Taiwan Leader’s Visit to the Mainland
- 4Former Chief of Chip Giant Unigroup Charged With Corruption
- 5Opinion: What China Can Learn From SVB’s Collapse
- 1Power To The People: Pintec Serves A Booming Consumer Class
- 2Largest hotel group in Europe accepts UnionPay
- 3UnionPay mobile QuickPass debuts in Hong Kong
- 4UnionPay International launches premium catering privilege U Dining Collection
- 5UnionPay International’s U Plan has covered over 1600 stores overseas