In Depth: China Prepares to Tear Down 25-Year Bank-Brokerage Divide
China’s regulators are planning a trial that could tear down the wall separating banks and securities companies, 25 years after the barrier was first put up to control the spread of risk between different parts of the financial system.
Caixin reported earlier this week that at least two large state-owned commercial banks are likely to be granted securities licenses by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) to test the waters. Sources familiar with the matter said the pilot program will initially involve allowing the lenders to offer only investment banking activities, rather than the full range of securities services that would include asset management, proprietary equity trading, and allowing customers to buy and sell shares.
Today, many of the world’s major economies have few, if any, barriers between banking and securities, although there have been restrictions in the past. On the Chinese mainland, the ban on commercial lenders undertaking activities such as underwriting initial public offerings (IPOs) and advising on mergers and acquisitions was put in place by the 1995 Commercial Bank Law. The aim was to prevent potential conflicts of interest between banking and securities operations and to minimize the risk of a crisis in one sector spreading to another.
The ban didn’t sever all ties however. A few financial conglomerates including Citic Group Corp., China Everbright Group Ltd., China Merchants Group Ltd. and Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. were allowed to own banking, securities and insurance businesses, although they are run separately. In addition, major state-owned lenders have been allowed to set up securities arms in Hong Kong, although they can’t do business on the mainland. State-owned lender Bank of China Ltd. and policy lender the China Development Bank are the only two banks that have their own securities arms on the mainland with special approval from the government. Banks are allowed to underwrite corporate bond issuances in the interbank bond market, but they are barred from underwriting any deals involving stocks, such as IPOs or secondary offerings.
The massive growth in China’s economy and financial sector over the past two decades, the recent acceleration in the opening-up of domestic capital markets to international investment banks such as Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and UBS Group AG, and the government’s encouragement of Chinese financial institutions to go global, have put regulators under increasing pressure to scrap the restrictions.
A turning point came in November 2017 just after U.S. President Donald Trump’s visit to China, when Zhu Guangyao, then vice finance minister, announced a blueprint to further open up the financial sector. The measures included a pledge to abolish the limits on foreign institutions’ ownership of securities joint ventures, and the deadline for the removal was later set for 2021. In July 2019, Premier Li Keqiang announced the lifting of the curbs would be brought forward by one year, and the date was subsequently set (link in Chinese) for April 1, 2020.
China’s banks are much bigger and stronger than they were 20 years ago. The four largest commercial lenders — Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd. (ICBC), Bank of China Ltd., China Construction Bank Corp. and Agricultural Bank of China Ltd. — are among the top 10 banks in the world in terms of assets. They are also on the list of 30 global systemically important banks compiled by the Financial Stability Board, an international body that monitors the global financial system.
But China’s securities firms are still minnows in comparison with both Chinese banks and their foreign rivals such as UBS, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Credit Suisse AG, all of which have won regulatory approval to take majority ownership of their Chinese ventures. Citic Securities Co. Ltd., Guotai Junan Securities Co. Ltd., GF Securities Co. Ltd. and Haitong Securities Co. Ltd. — the country’s four biggest investment banks (link in Chinese) by assets — don’t even appear on the list of the top 10 global investment banks by revenue.
Data from brokerage Huatai Securities Co. Ltd. show that in 2018, the combined revenue of domestic brokerages from investment banking business on the Chinese mainland was 37 billion yuan ($5.2 billion), while Goldman Sachs alone raked in 54 billion yuan from its global investment banking operations. And even though the combined market share of foreign securities firms in China is tiny, their superior operating capabilities and deeper expertise in capital markets and risk management, are raising concerns that domestic companies won’t be able to compete over the longer term.
In 2019, 36 mainland-listed banks made a total net profit of 1.67 trillion yuan, while the net profits of 37 listed securities firms were about 101.7 billion yuan, according to Caixin calculations based on their annual reports. Data (link in Chinese) from the Securities Association of China show that in 2019, the net profit of the 133 securities firms in China was 123.1 billion yuan, and their total assets reached 7.26 trillion yuan. While ICBC, the country’s largest bank by assets, saw its net profit reach 313.4 billion yuan last year and its total assets hit 30.1 trillion yuan.
By almost any measure, securities companies are in a weaker position to take on their foreign rivals whereas banks, given their size and financial firepower, would look to be a better bet. It’s not surprising that the government is receptive to allowing banks to enter the securities business, the rationale being that this will encourage the development of “flagship” securities companies that can compete more effectively in the domestic market.
Changing the rules
In 2018, ICBC submitted a proposal to the CSRC to establish a wholly owned securities subsidiary with registered capital of 100 billion yuan offering a full range of securities services, people familiar with the matter have told Caixin. That would dwarf Citic Securities, the largest brokerage in terms of assets, which only has registered capital of 13 billion yuan. ICBC planned to ring fence its securities subsidiary from the parent company in terms of assets, personnel, and deals to guard against interference in its operations, but to maintain a link between the two for issues such as risk management.
It remains unclear whether ICBC will be one of the banks chosen for the pilot program this time. In response to media reports about the program, the CSRC on Sunday said (link in Chinese) that there are a variety of ways to develop high-quality investment banks, which are now under discussion. “No matter what approach (to go with), there won’t be big impact on the status quo of the industry,” it said.
The government’s pilot program will initially restrict banks to a few lines of business rather than giving them carte blanche to offer the full range of securities services, sources have told Caixin. How the banks will be allowed to organize and manage their new investment banking subsidiaries is so far unclear, but one principle analysts are proposing is that they should have operational autonomy to prevent conflicts of interest and to protect client funds.
The pilot program could have a significant impact on China’s securities industry in its current form. Although the sector is dominated by a few large national firms, there are dozens of small regional brokerages, many of which have fallen on hard times either through mismanagement or just by being too small to compete. N-Securities Co. Ltd., a small outfit linked to secretive tycoon Zhang Zhenxin who died last year, is just one example of a firm that is now in trouble with regulators.
“Once banks are allowed to get into the securities business, the good times will be over for securities companies,” a senior investment banking manager with a domestic brokerage told Caixin, who predicted the change will lead to a major shake-out of the industry. “Small and midsize securities firms may end up being bought by banks, and there may only be a few large securities firms left,” the manager said.
But others argue that success is not a sure thing for the banks even if they have deep pockets. For a start they will have to spend time and money building their teams, expertise, and risk management capabilities. They will also need to beef up their financial incentives or it will be difficult for them to attract the smartest people.
“Banks may have the client resources built up from their lending operations, but securities firms are way ahead of them in terms of their ability to price their products, their competitiveness and risk management in the investment banking business,” a source in the investment banking division of China Securities Co. Ltd. told Caixin.
Han Wei and Lin Jinbing contributed to this report.
Contact reporter Guo Yingzhe (email@example.com) and editor Nerys Avery (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Caixin Global has launched Caixin CEIC Mobile, the mobile-only version of its world-class macroeconomic data platform.
- MOST POPULAR