Weekend Long Read: Raising Personal Income Key to Achieving Common Prosperity

To understand what it will take to achieve China’s common prosperity goal, we need to take a closer look at its income distribution patterns. It’s interesting to see how it differs from those of major economies.

We selected the 2018 fund flow statements of 20 countries from the OECD database and calculated the proportion of the three sectors in the distribution of national income.

The Nordic countries, which adopt social democracy and provide high level of welfare, have a significantly different distribution pattern. The share of government revenue is much higher than that in other countries, accounting for about 20% of the primary distribution. And the proportion is even more than 30% after redistribution adjustment.

At the same time, the share of the corporate sector’s revenue is relatively high, which is partly due to the extensive privatization of public services in countries with high welfare spending, where the corporate sector assumes some government functions. Correspondingly, the share of the resident sector’s revenue is relatively small.

The Nordic “welfare countries” generally follow an operation model that combines a mixed economy based on private ownership with state macro-regulation, and adopt a comprehensive social security system supported by high taxation. As a result, the Nordic countries have the largest public service sector and the highest tax burden in the world.

However, with the evolution of the global political and economic landscape, this kind of Scandinavian distribution pattern is also facing a series of challenges, including, first, a decline in policy independence due to European integration; second, relocation of enterprises and other tax payers abroad to due to high taxes; and third, an increase in government expenses due to the influx of refugees. At the same time, the refugees from the Middle East and North Africa coming to the Scandinavian countries have difficulty integrating into the local societies, which is creating social problems. In addition, the phenomena of “free riders” is reducing the enthusiasm of workers and hurting innovation.

Income distribution in China

We have compared China’s regular features of national income distribution to that of other major economies. As revealed by the comparison, China needs to address the following problems:

1. Lower-than-average share of personal income

Individuals accounted for 61.2% of China’s primary income distribution and 59.4% of the country’s disposable income in 2018. These figures were similar to those of Japan, South Korea and Russia, but lower than the average levels of the U.S. and the U.K.

The low share of personal income in China’s national income is largely attributed to low remuneration. Since the arrival of the Lewis turning point in 2008, labor has been a relatively rare resource in China. The share of net labor remuneration in China’s national income saw an increase from 30.3% to 38.4% in 2018. Yet, the country still falls behind developed economies in this regard, and the corresponding numbers for the U.S. and the U.K. are 52.4% and 49.6%, respectively.

2. Low share and structural stagnation of personal property income

Personal property income has long been a small part of China’s national income, which has been dependent on a single source, namely interest income. The net personal property income in 2018 accounted for no more than 3.2% of China’s national income, lower than those of most countries (U.S., 9.7%; Germany, 10.6%). Beyond that, in China’s personal property income, interest income accounted for up to 79.3%, while bonus income accounted for as low as 10.6%, falling far behind other countries.

High share of corporate income

Amid the previous capital accumulation-oriented development of China’s economy, enterprises kept bringing down staff salaries in an effort to play a larger part in income distribution. In fact, the share of corporate income in national income remains high in despite a downward trend in recent years.

Enterprises accounted for 26.0% of China’s primary income distribution (7.9 percentage points higher than the average level of other countries) and 21.8% of the country’s disposable income (5.2 percentage points higher than the average level of other countries), in 2018. For example, in that year, financial institutions accounted for 3.6% of China’s primary income distribution. While this figure was slightly lower than those of developing economies like Mexico and Turkey, it was higher than the average level of developed economies.

It is noteworthy that the high share of corporate income is partly due to the ownership characteristics of Chinese enterprises. State-holding enterprises, which make high profits, play a large part in the Chinese enterprise pool. For instance, in 2018, of the industrial enterprises above designated size, state-holding enterprises accounted for only 4.9% but represented 28.0% of the total profit.

Raising the social security expenditure

It remains unclear whether the share of government revenue is too high in China’s national income.

As revealed by a horizontal comparison based on our statistics, the Chinese government has a moderate share of the national income, as its share in the country’s primary income distributed and re-distributed income are similar to the average levels of its peers in the rest of the world.

But the Chinese government needs to optimize its revenue structure. The indirect tax-dominated tax structure has taken a toll on the peak shaving-like effect of taxation, as the burden of indirect tax is easy to shift to hinder an increase in the share of personal income. In contrast, the progressiveness of direct tax is conducive to adjusting the income gap between different groups. Along with that, China still has room to raise its social security expenditure, thereby expanding the coverage of social security.

We have defined a parameter named “net social security contribution,” which is the social security contribution minus the social security expenses. The absolute value of its share (negative value) in national disposable income is proportional to the level of social security. In recent years, China has given full play to the role of macro-control, the coverage of social security has been expanding continuously, and the social security expenditure has continued to rise. The share of the net social security contribution in the national disposable income has been negative for straight six years, standing at 0.6% in 2018. Despite this great achievement, China needs to do more to catch up with developed economies, such as the U.S. (-7.6%) and the U.K. (-5.1%).

There is no optimal or ideal income distribution pattern. The income distribution pattern of a country must reflect the country’s national reality and what is needed in its economic development.

Today, China’s overall landscape of income distribution is stable and continues to improve. In fact, it is increasingly becoming an important foundation for economic stability and progress and the broader vision of shared prosperity for everyone. In view of that, the following three policy suggestions are given.

(I) Further enlarging the share of labor remuneration in primary income distribution

To most low- and middle-income groups, labor remuneration represents the primary source of income. China needs to focus on the fundamental role of labor remuneration in income distribution and introduce relevant policies and measures to increase labor remuneration. This is conducive to increasing personal income and essential to fostering an olive-shaped income structure.

• China must continue to pursue the policy of giving high priority to employment. Work-based earnings rely on jobs, and cannot be raised without stable employment.

• China must regulate its labor market as a whole and transform the household registration system in ways that enable appropriate, orderly flows of manpower.

• China must also effectively ensure laborers’ access to humane treatment and basic rights and interests.

(II) Increasing the income from personal property

In general, when a country enters the middle-income bracket, it tends to see an increasingly fast rise in personal wealth, with property income becoming an important source of personal income. Yet, China, a middle-income country, features stagnant personal property income with a low share. Because of this, it is essential for the country to intensify its efforts in the capital market reform, improve its laws and regulations, and protect and increase personal property income by all means.

• China must give an impetus to the stable, healthy development of its securities market.

• China must expand its financial product pool. This will help provide residents with more ways of investment, add to residents’ income from deposits, bonds, insurances and foreign exchanges, and produce a wealth effect.

• China must do more to protect property rights by improving its legal system.

• China must improve land transfer mechanisms across its urban and rural areas, as a way to allow rural collective land for construction to be put on the market and to provide peasants with more access to property income.

(III) Optimizing the income redistribution mechanism and speeding up the development of the tertiary distribution system

Developing a “double-contributor” tax model that lays equal stress on turnover tax and income tax has been a focus in China for many years. However, indirect tax (e.g. turnover tax) still dominates the tax-based income distribution in the country. On top of that, it is crucial to increase the expenditure relevant to the people’s livelihood and improve social welfare.

• China must reform and improve its tax system. To this end, it is essential to shift the focus from indirect tax to direct tax, and enact laws on house tax and allocate consumption tax to local governments at a faster pace. Along with this, the feasibility and operability of inheritance tax and gift tax in China need to be explored over time.

• China must also improve its fiscal expenditure structure, which would enable an increase in the spending relevant to the people’s livelihood.

• China must improve its social security system.

• China must improve its stratified, classified social assistance system.

• China must develop its social welfare system by actively fostering charitable organizations and deepening awareness of charity across the whole society.

Luo Zhiheng is deputy director of the Yuekai Securities Research Institute.

Contact editor Michael Bellart (michaelbellart@caixin.com)

Download our app to receive breaking news alerts and read the news on the go.

Get our weekly free Must-Read newsletter.