Caixin
May 18, 2023 04:25 PM
FINANCE

In Depth: Court Ruling Sets Off Debate About Bond Fraud Compensation

00:00
00:00/00:00
Listen to this article 1x
The China Securities Regulatory Commission’s investigation into Snton, which ended in 2021, found that the company had fabricated profits for five straight years starting 2013. Photo: VCG
The China Securities Regulatory Commission’s investigation into Snton, which ended in 2021, found that the company had fabricated profits for five straight years starting 2013. Photo: VCG

A court verdict has triggered debate over two key issues in a fraud case involving a Chinese company’s two bond issuances — who should be allowed to sue for compensation, and how much they should be able to receive.

The verdict and accompanying debate offer a bit of clarity on how courts are interpreting a set of provisions that China’s Supreme People’s Court issued in January 2022 about trying civil lawsuits in which one party sues another for “misrepresentation” in the securities market, a crime that includes behavior such as filing false earnings. The provisions were drafted based on how the stock market works, and courts are still working out how to apply them to the bond market.

You've accessed an article available only to subscribers
VIEW OPTIONS
Share this article
Open WeChat and scan the QR code
NEWSLETTERS
Get our CX Daily, weekly Must-Read and China Green Bulletin newsletters delivered free to your inbox, bringing you China's top headlines.

We ‘ve added you to our subscriber list.

Manage subscription
PODCAST