Opinion: Trump Tariffs Could Boost China’s Influence Abroad
Through threatening even higher tariffs on China, Donald Trump is upping the pressure on China to change its trade practices, and ultimately the state-sponsored industry that underlies them. At the same time, through forging a trilateral partnership with Japan and Australia, as well as boosting ties with India, Trump is seeking to contain China and its international ambitions, which are best epitomized by the Belt and Road Initiative.
That is to say, the former measures seek to change China’s internal economic mechanisms while the latter seek to change China’s external economic mechanisms. Yet, what no one is talking about is the potential trade-off between the two — the possibility that Trump’s tariffs may actually boost China’s Belt and Road.
At its core, the Belt and Road is about China’s companies going global. And Trump’s tariffs paradoxically are encouraging Chinese firms to expedite their international expansions, particularly in the manufacturing sector. Here’s why:
1) Trump’s tariffs impose a tax on goods made in China. U.S. customs authorities collect the tax. This tax erodes the value of Chinese imports into the U.S., and ultimately, the revenue of Chinese companies.
2) Chinese companies still recognize the importance of the U.S. market, and look for ways to circumvent the tariffs and sell into the U.S.
3) Crucially, the tariff applies to goods made in China. That is to say, if a Chinese company produces the goods in a different country and then exports into the U.S., it will not need to pay the tariff. The Chinese company would still repatriate the profits back to China, however.
4) Hence, Chinese companies are incentivized to relocate their production abroad. This in turn bolsters the Belt and Road Initiative.
This trick is not new, yet seems to have been blatantly ignored by U.S. policymakers in the context of the trade war. Of course, it is not in the interest of Chinese companies to advertise the fact they are exploiting discrepancies in the application of U.S. tariffs.
Let’s take some historical examples. In 2012, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Commission imposed tariffs on solar panels produced on the Chinese mainland. Chinese companies responded by moving their production to Taiwan. In 2015, the U.S. extended the tariffs to Taiwan, yet Chinese manufacturers still had many other options, including Vietnam, for production purposes. The U.S. was unable to close the loophole, and was unable to save U.S. solar companies from international market pressures.
Apparel is another example. Restrictive U.S. quotas on Chinese apparel imports have incentivized Chinese companies to relocate abroad. Africa benefits from preferential access into the U.S. market through the African Growth and Opportunity Act, and as a result, Chinese companies have moved their production to Africa, including the Huajian shoe company, which has a presence in Ethiopia; and C&H Garments, in Rwanda. A 2012 University of Oxford study verified these findings.
We are still in the early stages of this trade war, but as the scope of products included increases, and the tariff levied is raised, the incentive for Chinese companies to move production abroad will only be strengthened. Discussions have already started between China and Vietnam to create manufacturing hubs on the Vietnamese side of the border, so that Chinese companies could register there, claim their products are “Made in Vietnam” and export to the U.S.
It would be difficult for the U.S. to prevent Chinese relocation from happening, given that the only way of consistent implementation would be to apply equal tariffs across all countries that could serve as potential manufacturing hubs for Chinese companies. This is not feasible, nor fair on local companies in these markets.
As a result, the U.S. runs the very real risk that tariffs imposed will actually boost China’s flagship foreign policy initiative, the Belt and Road. Such is the law of unintended consequences.
Grzegorz Stec is a co-founder of Belt and Road Advisory, a consulting platform providing information on all matters concerning the Belt and Road Initiative.
Read more about China-U.S. trade tensions.
Apr 09 15:37
Apr 09 09:34
Apr 08 16:58
Apr 08 13:04
Apr 08 09:33
Apr 08 04:23
Apr 07 15:36
Apr 07 12:22
Apr 07 10:21
Apr 03 18:41
Apr 03 16:11
- 1In Depth: Why There Will Be No Quick Cure for Trade After the Pandemic
- 2In Luckin Debacle, Who’s to Blame for Missing Massive Fraud?
- 3Interview: Zhang Wenhong Warns of Second Wave of Covid-19 Pandemic
- 4Germany to Buy Avigan From Japan to Fight Coronavirus
- 5Reporters’ Notebook: Our 76 Days Locked Down in Wuhan
- 1Power To The People: Pintec Serves A Booming Consumer Class
- 2Largest hotel group in Europe accepts UnionPay
- 3UnionPay mobile QuickPass debuts in Hong Kong
- 4UnionPay International launches premium catering privilege U Dining Collection
- 5UnionPay International’s U Plan has covered over 1600 stores overseas