Chinese Investment in Key Real Estate Markets Tumbles 8.4% in 2017
Chinese corporate investment in overseas real estate has dropped amid the trade war with the U.S. and Beijing’s tightening control over capital outflows, London-based real estate consultancy Knight Frank said in a report.
Investments in properties valued over $3 million from Chinese mainland firms in the key real estate markets of the U.K., the U.S., Australia and Hong Kong dipped to $26.85 billion in 2017, an 8.4% drop year-on-year, the report found. The report did not provide a figure for investments in properties valued under $3 million.
While total Chinese outbound investment in overseas real estate last year continued to grow, up 11.7% at $43.98 billion, this was largely due to the $14.56 billion acquisition of a European logistics portfolio by state-owned China Investment Corp., according to the report. “Without this mammoth deal, Chinese capital outflow in 2017 would actually have fallen 25.3% year-on-year,” the report said.
“The China-U.S. trade war, Brexit, and the Fed rate hike are factors that have influenced the investors, but these are not the essential reasons,” said David Ji, Knight Frank’s head of Greater China research and consultancy, at a briefing in Hong Kong on Oct. 12.
Starting in 2017, China began to clamp down on companies racking up huge debts through outbound investment. Conglomerate HNA Group, formerly one of China’s biggest overseas shoppers, has been offloading many overseas assets. Property developer Dalian Wanda Group has also been trimming its assets to lighten its debt load.
“The cycle of Chinese investors’ bulk buying of the overseas real estate has come to an end as China’s capital outflow restrictions have influenced the preferences of the investors,” Ji said.
China’s capital outflow controls have had a “detrimental impact” on markets, including the U.S. and Australia, where the value of Chinese real estate investment last year dropped to $5.99 billion and $2.6 billion respectively, the report said. That was a 64% year-on-year decline in the U.S. and a 51% drop in Australia.
Also, relations between China and both countries have grown increasingly tense. Beijing and Washington have slapped rounds of tit-for-tat tariffs on each other since earlier this year. Over the last two years, scandals over alleged Chinese influence on Australian politics have soured the relationship, having an indirect impact on investment in the country, which fell as a whole by 40% in 2017.
In stark contrast, the U.K. and Hong Kong saw rapid growth in Chinese investment last year. Investors spent $9.69 billion on British properties, a 445% year-on-year surge, while mainland investment in Hong Kong grew 61% to $8.57 billion.
Chinese developers have been snapping up major sites in the U.K, according to the report. Guangzhou-based R&F Properties Co. Ltd. last year partnered with Hong Kong property developer C C Land Holdings Ltd. in a 470-million-pound ($617.7 million) deal to acquire prime London residential site Nine Elms Square, the report said.
Ji told Caixin that the leases in London often cover a span of 10 years, at which time the impact of the U.K.’s withdrawal from the EU may have faded, so Brexit is unlikely to affect the long-term price of the properties being bought by Chinese investors.
However, 2017 appears to have been an outlier for Chinese investment in British property. In the first seven months of this year, investment was down to $1.26 billion, according to the Knight Frank report.
The integration of Hong Kong into the Greater Bay Area and the completion of major transportation projects have helped trigger mainland investors’ interest and have boosted the city’s commercial property and real estate leasing markets, the consultancy suggested in the report.
“As the Sino-U.S. trade dispute rages on, its ramifications will spread beyond trade to the general investment environment in gateway cities,” said the report. “So in the short run, New York’s loss is London’s and Hong Kong’s gain.”
Contact reporter Timmy Shen (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Feb 25 18:27
Feb 25 17:52
Feb 25 15:49
Feb 25 13:28
Feb 25 12:52
Feb 24 18:02
Feb 24 17:28
Feb 24 14:15
Feb 24 14:04
Feb 24 13:10
Feb 22 03:07
Feb 21 14:54
Feb 20 17:29
Feb 20 15:19
Feb 20 14:58
- 1Another Study Claims Wuhan Seafood Market May Not Be Source of Covid-19 Outbreak
- 2Coronavirus Friday Update: ‘No Turning Point Yet,’ Politburo Meeting Finds; Cases in Iran ‘Worrisome,’ WHO Says
- 3Coronavirus Sunday Update: Iran Reports 8 Deaths; Chinese Researchers Doubt Wuhan Virus Origin
- 4Will Warming Weather Kill Off Covid-19? Scientists Aren’t Sure
- 5 Coronavirus Saturday Update: Global Spread Accelerates as South Korea Reports 142 New Cases; Xi Jinping Thanks Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
- 1Power To The People: Pintec Serves A Booming Consumer Class
- 2Largest hotel group in Europe accepts UnionPay
- 3UnionPay mobile QuickPass debuts in Hong Kong
- 4UnionPay International launches premium catering privilege U Dining Collection
- 5UnionPay International’s U Plan has covered over 1600 stores overseas